{"id":72294,"date":"2022-05-02T14:00:40","date_gmt":"2022-05-02T04:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=72294"},"modified":"2022-05-02T13:48:03","modified_gmt":"2022-05-02T03:48:03","slug":"australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia should make its own long-range missiles"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

In a recent article<\/a> on this forum, Peter Dean argued that a rethink of the Australian Defence Force\u2019s land-based strike requirements is needed to ensure it won\u2019t be outgunned both qualitatively and quantitatively in a future conflict. His proposed solution is for the Department of Defence to expand the Land 8113 project and equip the Australian Army with land-based Tomahawk missiles.<\/p>\n

The concept underlying the argument is sound, but the proposal doesn\u2019t go far enough.<\/p>\n

Several issues require examination.<\/p>\n

The first is the accepted concept of placing a potential adversary at risk early. This requires long-range precision-guided weapons. Something akin to the Tomahawk or LRASM (long-range anti-ship missile) is the answer.<\/p>\n

The second is to put in place a believable deterrence capability. Deterrence is defined by the Oxford dictionary as \u2018the action of discouraging an action or event through instilling doubt or fear of the consequences\u2019\u2014that is, the potential adversary needs to understand that it has actually been placed at risk. Again, something akin to the Tomahawk or LRASM is required, together with the necessary surveillance, targeting and datalink capabilities.<\/p>\n

As outlined by Dean, the third aspect is the ability to deploy, both for operational flexibility and for protection. Something akin to a land-based, mobile Tomahawk or LRASM would be suitable.<\/p>\n

The fourth issue is potentially the most important and concerns the risk of resupply. This is where a sole focus on the Tomahawk starts to fall over.<\/p>\n

Given that we\u2019re likely to be participating in the same fight as the Tomahawk supplier, it\u2019s difficult to see how we would have suitable options for resupply once our stockpiled weapons had been fired. After all, the US will need every weapon coming off the production line for its own forces. That means the Tomahawk or LRASM can be the answer only in the short term to provide an immediate capability.<\/p>\n

The fifth issue concerns risks and alternatives. Resupply risks at the critical time will be high, and stockpiled missiles have a shelf life measured in years, not decades. Stockpiling is not the answer. We need to design and build our own land-based long-range and hypersonic weapons here. The ADF needs weapons that don\u2019t have to be integrated into complex platforms but can be fired \u2018from the back of a truck\u2019. It needs weapons fitted to platforms that don\u2019t require complex maintenance regimes or highly trained personnel.<\/p>\n

Designing and building this type of missile here will provide part of the asymmetric capabilities that Australia needs. It will contribute to the development of the believable deterrent posture that Australia needs but doesn\u2019t have. An extra ship, an extra couple of planes and additional tanks are not going to make any real difference. The ability to manufacture and deploy large numbers of domestically designed hypersonic weapons will.<\/p>\n

The usual retort to such a suggestion is that the design and build of guided weapons is long term, expensive and beyond the capability of the Australian defence industry to deliver. (The subtext to this argument is that it\u2019s cheaper and easier to just buy from overseas and stockpile.)<\/p>\n

Australia\u2019s defence industry has proven itself time and time again as being capable of developing advanced technologies for defence purposes, but the cultural cringe within the Defence Department typically forces these local developments into the loving embrace of the global primes.<\/p>\n

The local industry is replete with companies capable of contributing to a domestic effort to build long-range hypersonic missiles: flight vehicle and sensor design and manufacture, propellant technology, command and control systems, integration with the firing platform.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s no doubt that the process to develop hypersonic weapons will be long and expensive, but it\u2019s not a question about cost and ease. It\u2019s a question of risk, and particularly the risk of not developing this capability here, to meet our own requirements, for our own use, when and where we might need to use it. Not developing these weapons will see us expend large amounts of resources on a finite stockpile that cannot be replenished when we need it to be.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a popular proverb that says: \u2018The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.\u2019<\/p>\n

It\u2019s time to get cracking.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In a recent article on this forum, Peter Dean argued that a rethink of the Australian Defence Force\u2019s land-based strike requirements is needed to ensure it won\u2019t be outgunned both qualitatively and quantitatively in a …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":239,"featured_media":72296,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[44,126,2357,268,362],"class_list":["post-72294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-defence-force","tag-defence-industry","tag-hypersonics","tag-missile","tag-strike"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAustralia should make its own long-range missiles | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia should make its own long-range missiles | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In a recent article on this forum, Peter Dean argued that a rethink of the Australian Defence Force\u2019s land-based strike requirements is needed to ensure it won\u2019t be outgunned both qualitatively and quantitatively in a ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-05-02T04:00:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-05-02T03:48:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/patriot020522.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"801\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graeme Dunk\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graeme Dunk\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/patriot020522.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/patriot020522.jpg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":801},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/\",\"name\":\"Australia should make its own long-range missiles | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-05-02T04:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-05-02T03:48:03+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/8c3d02d9201608da417178ebdfec6d5f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australia should make its own long-range missiles\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/8c3d02d9201608da417178ebdfec6d5f\",\"name\":\"Graeme Dunk\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d610dcf98bddd9d228242077fa5be69?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d610dcf98bddd9d228242077fa5be69?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graeme Dunk\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dunk\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia should make its own long-range missiles | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia should make its own long-range missiles | The Strategist","og_description":"In a recent article on this forum, Peter Dean argued that a rethink of the Australian Defence Force\u2019s land-based strike requirements is needed to ensure it won\u2019t be outgunned both qualitatively and quantitatively in a ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2022-05-02T04:00:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-05-02T03:48:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":801,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/patriot020522.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graeme Dunk","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graeme Dunk","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/patriot020522.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/patriot020522.jpg","width":1200,"height":801},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/","name":"Australia should make its own long-range missiles | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-05-02T04:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2022-05-02T03:48:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/8c3d02d9201608da417178ebdfec6d5f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-should-make-its-own-long-range-missiles\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australia should make its own long-range missiles"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/8c3d02d9201608da417178ebdfec6d5f","name":"Graeme Dunk","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d610dcf98bddd9d228242077fa5be69?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d610dcf98bddd9d228242077fa5be69?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graeme Dunk"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dunk\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72294"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/239"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=72294"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72294\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":72297,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72294\/revisions\/72297"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/72296"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=72294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=72294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=72294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}