{"id":725,"date":"2012-08-14T14:56:21","date_gmt":"2012-08-14T04:56:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=725"},"modified":"2013-01-07T15:08:37","modified_gmt":"2013-01-07T05:08:37","slug":"table-of-the-week-ship-shape-naval-force-structures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/table-of-the-week-ship-shape-naval-force-structures\/","title":{"rendered":"Table of the week: Ship shape \u2013 naval force structures"},"content":{"rendered":"
The structure of a country\u2019s naval fleet should reflect the thinking of governments (and navy) about their use of the sea. To a large extent it\u2019s possible to \u2018reverse engineer\u2019 naval aspirations from the force structure. For example, true blue water capability requires long endurance, which in turn means larger vessels and\/or the ability to replenish them at sea. As well, blue water forces often operate with the support of long-range maritime patrol aircraft. Conversely, navies intended to predominantly operate closer to home have a preponderance of smaller (and hence shorter-ranged) vessels for littoral operations, and there is less emphasis on replenishment vessels and long-range air support.<\/p>\n
No surprises there. But we can quantify some of these observations, and when we do, some interesting results pop out. During his time at ASPI a while back, then intern Tonmoy Dutta-Roy (who\u2019s now doing his bit to alleviate navy\u2019s shortage of engineers) came up with a simple but interesting method of measuring the shape<\/em> of a navy. His insight was to note that priorities are obvious when you look at the ratio of various parts of the fleet\u2014the number of major combatants divided by the number of minor combatants, being one example. Or the number of maritime patrol aircraft divided by the number of major combatants etc. Of course, anything worthwhile in the defence world needs a three letter acronym, so these ratios are called Force Structure Indices (FSIs).<\/p>\n Let\u2019s see how this works by looking at various nations\u2019 blue water aspirations. Here the USN is supreme\u2014there\u2019s no other navy capable with its power projection capabilities (or that\u2019s even close). So we\u2019ll use the USN as a benchmark against which we measure the capabilities of other navies. The results are in the table below.<\/p>\n Table 1<\/strong>: Force structure indices for selected navies. (Data source: Jane\u2019s Fighting Ships)<\/p>\n