{"id":73154,"date":"2022-06-11T15:22:53","date_gmt":"2022-06-11T05:22:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=73154"},"modified":"2022-06-15T09:48:18","modified_gmt":"2022-06-14T23:48:18","slug":"shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/","title":{"rendered":"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

The first Shangri-La Dialogue since 2019 is a chance for world leaders and ministers to discuss urgent and long-term international security questions, including a focus on whether rules and sovereignty matter anymore.<\/p>\n

The answer has been a resounding \u2018yes\u2019, but much discussion has focused on what words we shouldn\u2019t use and what actions we shouldn\u2019t take.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t refer to \u2018the West\u2019 as it will upset the East. Don\u2019t use the word \u2018democracy\u2019 as it will upset non-democratic countries. Don\u2019t say \u2018strategic competition\u2019 as it frightens the non-aligned movement. Don\u2019t say you support the US as it will be seen as provoking major-power rivalry. Don\u2019t call out Chinese Communist Party aggression as that is asking countries to make a binary choice between China and the US. Don\u2019t let the US change its strategic-ambiguity approach to Taiwan as it might provoke China. Don\u2019t talk about security components of the Quad as the region won\u2019t like it. Don\u2019t have clear foreign policy and defence strategies. Don\u2019t ask countries to choose.<\/p>\n

It left a sense of needing to apologise for being democratic and for expecting countries and their governments to have and follow international standards. Oh, by the way, don\u2019t mention international standards as they are Western standards driven by the US that are anti-China.<\/p>\n

All of this is, of course, only serving authoritarian regimes because it enables the narrative that anyone calling out their malicious actions is being provocative. Don\u2019t ask me to stop hitting you or I\u2019ll punish you by hitting you harder.<\/p>\n

Such discussions about what we cannot or should not do also distracts from many of the urgent issues at hand. It means the discussion doesn\u2019t have to fully recognise the reality of what is happening around us\u2014economic coercion, military expansion, cyber intrusions, foreign interference, human rights abuses, misuse of technologies. Don\u2019t talk about these things as it might upset some nations, and the people doing them, or those hoping to ignore them.<\/p>\n

It is of course always important to adapt to different audiences, to understand different interests and to not impose our values on others. But we need to shift from a foreign policy of \u2018don\u2019ts\u2019 to a foreign and strategic policy of what we must and can do\u2014ourselves, and with others. And in doing so we should not be apologetic about what we are\u2014democratic\u2014and what our principles are: standing up for our freedoms, security and sovereignty and holding to account those responsible for breaching our freedom, security and sovereignty.<\/p>\n

It’s easier to say what not to do, or what we don\u2019t like, than what should be done. So, what actions should Australia, our allies and likeminded partners take that advance our interests, protect our values and promote a peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific?<\/p>\n

First, recognise that being true to our own values doesn\u2019t have to mean diverging from the interests of those we want to partner with, across Southeast Asia, Europe and the Pacific islands. We have proven that our democratic values are consistent with our aligned interests with Vietnam and Philippines on issues such as trade and the South China Sea. Freedom of navigation and resilient supply chains are in all our collective interests.<\/p>\n

Second, the Australia\u2013US\u2013Japan Trilateral Strategic Dialogue should be revamped. Understandably, this dialogue has taken a back seat to the important development of the Quad, but it needs to be viewed as a vital cog for our long-term security. It can, for example, discuss key issues, such as Taiwan, in a way that the Quad is currently unable to. This is not a criticism of the Quad, which is among the most important partnerships for Australia.<\/p>\n

Third, Australia should make clear that human rights matter. We should show that we can maintain relations with countries while addressing human rights and, where necessary, calling out crimes against humanity. Too often nations only call out the bad behaviour of those countries with which they do not have a significant economic relationship. This has enabled some to argue that trade reduces the potential for conflict. But this is a falsehood, seen not just by Russia\u2019s war in Ukraine or even World War I, but because this mentality has meant that China has been winning a contest and conflict, one that simply hasn\u2019t involved bullets and missiles.<\/p>\n

We should ensure that even where we are economically entwined we are able to maintain our principles. In this regard, the new Australian government should use the Magnitsky powers to sanction those responsible for human rights abuses against Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. All other Magnitsky countries\u2014the US, the UK and Canada\u2014and the EU did so last year and it was a mistake for the previous Australian government to have left it to the new government. Notwithstanding this omission, the new government should join our partners and make it clear that we will also stand up for those unable to do so themselves due to oppression, coercion and subjugation.<\/p>\n

Fourth, just as we should call out the bad behaviour of authoritarian states, we should be up-front with our allies, friends and partners. While being realistic that it won\u2019t be reversed in the short term, Australia should continue to tell the US that it was a strategic mistake to withdraw from the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Although there can be many other positive initiatives, such as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity<\/a>, nothing will equate to the strategic heft of the US joining the TPP\u2019s successor, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. In the meantime, we should fast-track those keen to join that meet the high standards of trade and economic investment. That means making the UK and Taiwan new members.<\/p>\n

Fifth, European countries, in particular collectively as the EU, have significant power and we should encourage them to be more actively aligned. For too long, key European countries have inconsistently countered\u2014and often outright avoided countering\u2014malicious authoritarian behaviour. The EU response to China\u2019s economic coercion of Lithuania demonstrated the collective power of the EU. Imagine the collective power of the EU with the US, Japan, Australia and others to both deter such behaviour and respond to it. Consistent, aligned approaches deter malicious authoritarian behaviour. It is the current inconsistency that encourages the bad behaviour we too often see today.<\/p>\n

In this regard, head of the International Institute for Strategic Studies think tank in Berlin and former ASPI scholar Ben Schreer correctly told the dialogue on Friday that the \u2018middle way\u2019 in which Europe benefits from US security without joining strategic competition against China and Russia is no longer the right approach, because European values and interests are more aligned to those of the US, rather than those of China or Russia. The malign activities of China and Russia will continue and this will eventually force their hand, as we\u2019ve seen with the illegal war against Ukraine.<\/p>\n

Which brings us back to the don\u2019ts\u2014don\u2019t ask anyone to choose. We should be clear that not choosing is actually making a choice. And that, instead, the key is being free to choose.<\/p>\n

Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, in the dialogue\u2019s keynote address, asked and answered this key question for Australia and our partners:<\/p>\n

Can the rules-based international order we have built through hard work, dialogue and consensus be upheld and the march of peace and prosperity continue? Or will we return to a lawless world where rules are ignored and broken, where unilateral changes to the status quo by force are unchallenged and accepted, and where the strong coerce the weak militarily or economically?<\/p>\n

That is the choice we have to make today.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The first Shangri-La Dialogue since 2019 is a chance for world leaders and ministers to discuss urgent and long-term international security questions, including a focus on whether rules and sovereignty matter anymore. The answer has …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1559,"featured_media":73156,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[106,294,358,2397,444],"class_list":["post-73154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-democracy","tag-diplomacy","tag-shangri-la-dialogue","tag-us-alliances","tag-values"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nShangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0 | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0 | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The first Shangri-La Dialogue since 2019 is a chance for world leaders and ministers to discuss urgent and long-term international security questions, including a focus on whether rules and sovereignty matter anymore. The answer has ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-11T05:22:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-14T23:48:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241216276.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"681\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Justin Bassi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Justin Bassi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241216276.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241216276.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":681,\"caption\":\"Japan`s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivers a keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore on June 10, 2022. (Photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN \/ AFP) \/ The erroneous mention[s] appearing in the metadata of this photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN has been modified in AFP systems in the following manner: [Kishida] instead of [Kashida]. Please immediately remove the erroneous mention[s] from all your online services and delete it (them) from your servers. If you have been authorized by AFP to distribute it (them) to third parties, please ensure that the same actions are carried out by them. Failure to promptly comply with these instructions will entail liability on your part for any continued or post notification usage. Therefore we thank you very much for all your attention and prompt action. We are sorry for the inconvenience this notification may cause and remain at your disposal for any further information you may require. (Photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN\/AFP via Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/\",\"name\":\"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0 | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-11T05:22:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-14T23:48:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321\",\"name\":\"Justin Bassi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Justin Bassi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/justin-bassi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0 | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0 | The Strategist","og_description":"The first Shangri-La Dialogue since 2019 is a chance for world leaders and ministers to discuss urgent and long-term international security questions, including a focus on whether rules and sovereignty matter anymore. The answer has ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2022-06-11T05:22:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-14T23:48:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":681,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241216276.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Justin Bassi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Justin Bassi","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241216276.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241216276.jpg","width":1024,"height":681,"caption":"Japan`s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivers a keynote address at the Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore on June 10, 2022. (Photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN \/ AFP) \/ The erroneous mention[s] appearing in the metadata of this photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN has been modified in AFP systems in the following manner: [Kishida] instead of [Kashida]. Please immediately remove the erroneous mention[s] from all your online services and delete it (them) from your servers. If you have been authorized by AFP to distribute it (them) to third parties, please ensure that the same actions are carried out by them. Failure to promptly comply with these instructions will entail liability on your part for any continued or post notification usage. Therefore we thank you very much for all your attention and prompt action. We are sorry for the inconvenience this notification may cause and remain at your disposal for any further information you may require. (Photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN\/AFP via Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/","name":"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0 | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-06-11T05:22:53+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-14T23:48:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/shangri-la-dialogue-sovereignty-means-being-free-to-choose\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shangri-La Dialogue: sovereignty means being free to choose\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321","name":"Justin Bassi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Justin Bassi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/justin-bassi\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73154"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1559"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73154"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73229,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73154\/revisions\/73229"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}