{"id":73375,"date":"2022-06-24T06:00:13","date_gmt":"2022-06-23T20:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=73375"},"modified":"2022-06-24T05:36:08","modified_gmt":"2022-06-23T19:36:08","slug":"iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

The International Atomic Energy Agency\u2019s 8 June motion to censure<\/a> Iran for not disclosing three decades-old former secret nuclear sites, and Tehran\u2019s response of removing multiple IAEA cameras that monitor Iranian uranium enrichment levels, doesn\u2019t foreshadow the imminent collapse of the Iran nuclear deal or provide any evidence of Iranian intent to develop a nuclear weapon.<\/p>\n

What these events do represent is further, serious manoeuvring by key stakeholders in the deal (officially, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA) to leverage their advantages during the ongoing attempts to revive it.<\/p>\n

Negotiations between Iran and the US to revive the JCPOA stalled<\/a> in March when the two sides reached an impasse on trade-offs over US sanctions and verification procedures. However, the Iranians now claim that the major stumbling block is their demand that the US remove Iran\u2019s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) from its list of foreign terrorist organisations.<\/p>\n

For Iran, this demand is reportedly \u2018non-negotiable\u2019 given the IRGC\u2019s special national security role, including \u2018defending the revolution\u2019 from internal and external threats, and the role of its Quds Force in promoting Iranian interests abroad, especially regionally, largely through both military and paramilitary means.<\/p>\n

The US, which designated the IRGC as a terrorist organisation in 2019 because of its support to other regional terrorist organisations such as Lebanon\u2019s Hezbollah and the Palestinian movement Hamas, has rejected Iran\u2019s demand, claiming the IRGC\u2019s listing is unrelated to nuclear sanctions. This is technically correct. However, while most of the 1,500 or so US sanctions imposed on Iran by former president Donald Trump are not directly nuclear related, they are indirectly related as part of his much wider \u2018maximum pressure\u2019 campaign.<\/p>\n

What is or is not negotiable by either side will depend on what each wants from a revived deal.<\/p>\n

For Iran, do the principles behind its stand on the IRGC outweigh the broader benefits of the US lifting key economic sanctions? That would give Iran access to billions of dollars of frozen funds and some return to normal trade, especially the export of oil and gas, across international markets. Although Iran has so far survived the effects of US sanctions, the direct and indirect costs<\/a>\u00a0to its economy and people have been substantial. There\u2019s a strong imperative to reach a revived deal for its immediate benefits, and a hope that international pressure due to Iran\u2019s assumed total, transparent compliance with the deal\u2019s conditions would stop any future US administration from a repeat withdrawal.<\/p>\n

For the US, the principal benefit would be meeting its non-proliferation objective by facilitating Iran\u2019s recommitment not to develop nuclear weapons and putting in place monitoring procedures that would very quickly detect any intent to do so. The US would also seek to significantly extend the sunset dates for existing safeguard. That outcome would help settle one element of instability in the Middle East. A more stable Middle East would also enable the US to continue to lessen its military commitment to the region and redirect its interests and efforts to Europe and Asia (that is, Russia and China). Collectively, these outcomes could also meet US needs<\/a> stated in late May by Robert Malley, US special envoy for Iran, that the benefits of a revived deal to the US must outweigh the relief that Iran would receive.<\/p>\n

However, Malley was also reported as saying that demands that go beyond the scope of the JCPOA\u2014which presumably include removal of the IRGC from the US list of foreign terrorist organisations\u2014will continue to be rejected. There\u2019s another US reality also: congressional constraints could, and most likely would, prevent President Joe Biden from unilaterally delisting the IRGC.<\/p>\n

The challenge to the logic of reaching a deal is making it happen. This month\u2019s IAEA censure motion was a hard push in that direction. It was submitted by the US and three IAEA governing board members, the UK, France and Germany, and approved by 30 of the 35 board members, including Australia. It picked up on an Iranian technical non-disclosure and Iran\u2019s inadequate response to evidence of nuclear activity some decades ago at three nuclear locations, two in Tehran province and one in the northwestern province of Kurdistan.<\/p>\n

This censure motion sought to expose Iran as untrustworthy about past, and potentially future, disclosures of nuclear development. Evidence of the sites was reportedly provided by Israel, which has made detailed exposures of Iran\u2019s nuclear programs prior to 2003. Israel is a member of the IAEA board, but not a member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.<\/p>\n

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi added to these concerns on 9 June when he claimed<\/a> that the removal of monitoring cameras would not enable the IAEA to continue to monitor enrichment levels, suggesting that Iran could produce uranium enriched to 90%, which is weapons grade, in \u2018three to four weeks\u2019. He said this \u2018would be a fatal blow\u2019 to future JCPOA negotiations.<\/p>\n

This was a clear message to Iran of a lack of trust, and implied that trust could be restored, and monitored, through a revived JCPOA.<\/p>\n

Tehran\u2019s decision to remove the IAEA\u2019s monitoring capability was, presumably, the reverse side of the same coin: to put pressure on the US to rejoin a revitalised JCPOA, enabling Iran to demonstrate trust through its recommitment, along with all other original signatories, to non-proliferation and all JCPOA enrichment, verification and dispute-resolution provisions.<\/p>\n

According to several sources with expertise in non-proliferation, there is no evidence that Iran is covertly developing a nuclear weapon or intends to do so. If it did, it would quickly be discovered by related intelligence coverage across Iran\u2019s nuclear industry. It is widely assessed that Iran wants the JCPOA revived, but will play hardball to maximise the benefits it receives. The US also wants to rejoin, but not at the cost of delisting the IRGC. Sparring will continue pending a face-saving formula acceptable to both sides.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The International Atomic Energy Agency\u2019s 8 June motion to censure Iran for not disclosing three decades-old former secret nuclear sites, and Tehran\u2019s response of removing multiple IAEA cameras that monitor Iranian uranium enrichment levels, doesn\u2019t …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":205,"featured_media":73379,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[173,247,1883,1361,31],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nIran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The International Atomic Energy Agency\u2019s 8 June motion to censure Iran for not disclosing three decades-old former secret nuclear sites, and Tehran\u2019s response of removing multiple IAEA cameras that monitor Iranian uranium enrichment levels, doesn\u2019t ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-06-23T20:00:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-06-23T19:36:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241196989.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"715\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ian Dudgeon\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ian Dudgeon\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241196989.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241196989.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":715,\"caption\":\"TOPSHOT - Photographers and tv cameramen watch a demonstration of a monitoring camera used in Iran during a press conference of Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) about the current situation in Iran at the agency's headquarters in Vienna, Austria on June 09, 2022. - Iran is removing 27 surveillance cameras at nuclear facilities, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head Rafael Grossi said, calling it a \\\"serious challenge\\\" to the agency's work in the country. (Photo by JOE KLAMAR \/ AFP) (Photo by JOE KLAMAR\/AFP via Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/\",\"name\":\"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-06-23T20:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-06-23T19:36:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/260e7ee6c4373d9bc7dff029df65e182\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/260e7ee6c4373d9bc7dff029df65e182\",\"name\":\"Ian Dudgeon\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d3c9536900bdb17085b34bba23a3850f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d3c9536900bdb17085b34bba23a3850f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ian Dudgeon\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/ian-dudgeon\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal | The Strategist","og_description":"The International Atomic Energy Agency\u2019s 8 June motion to censure Iran for not disclosing three decades-old former secret nuclear sites, and Tehran\u2019s response of removing multiple IAEA cameras that monitor Iranian uranium enrichment levels, doesn\u2019t ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2022-06-23T20:00:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-06-23T19:36:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":715,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241196989.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Ian Dudgeon","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ian Dudgeon","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241196989.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/GettyImages-1241196989.jpg","width":1024,"height":715,"caption":"TOPSHOT - Photographers and tv cameramen watch a demonstration of a monitoring camera used in Iran during a press conference of Rafael Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) about the current situation in Iran at the agency's headquarters in Vienna, Austria on June 09, 2022. - Iran is removing 27 surveillance cameras at nuclear facilities, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) head Rafael Grossi said, calling it a \"serious challenge\" to the agency's work in the country. (Photo by JOE KLAMAR \/ AFP) (Photo by JOE KLAMAR\/AFP via Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/","name":"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-06-23T20:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2022-06-23T19:36:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/260e7ee6c4373d9bc7dff029df65e182"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/iran-us-nuclear-negotiations-sparring-will-continue-but-both-want-a-deal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Iran\u2013US nuclear negotiations: sparring will continue, but both want a deal"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/260e7ee6c4373d9bc7dff029df65e182","name":"Ian Dudgeon","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d3c9536900bdb17085b34bba23a3850f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/d3c9536900bdb17085b34bba23a3850f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ian Dudgeon"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/ian-dudgeon\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73375"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/205"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73375"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73375\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73393,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73375\/revisions\/73393"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/73379"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}