{"id":74104,"date":"2022-07-27T06:00:40","date_gmt":"2022-07-26T20:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=74104"},"modified":"2022-07-26T18:17:01","modified_gmt":"2022-07-26T08:17:01","slug":"international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/","title":{"rendered":"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

On Friday, the International Court of Justice announced that it had comprehensively rejected<\/a> Myanmar\u2019s objections to the continuation of the genocide case brought against it by the Republic of the Gambia over the treatment of Myanmar\u2019s Rohingya ethnic minority. In a small but important victory for international justice, the case can now continue on to a final determination of Myanmar\u2019s responsibility for genocide.<\/p>\n

While the case can now proceed, Myanmar\u2019s objections to the ICJ\u2019s capacity to hear the case have delayed the proceedings, and thereby justice for the Rohingya, by at least a year and a half. The delay has meant that the one million Rohingya in Bangladeshi refugee camps and the tens of thousands still in internment camps in Myanmar\u2019s western Rakhine State have continued to suffer in detention while waiting for these international legal processes to play out.<\/p>\n

The case was originally brought in November 2019 by the Gambia, which alleged that Myanmar had committed genocide against the Rohingya during \u2018clearance operations\u2019 in Rakhine State, primarily in 2017<\/a>. These operations resulted in the exodus of 740,000 mostly Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh, and involved serious human rights violations including mass killing, torture, rape and sexual assault, and the destruction of homes and mosques.<\/p>\n

In December 2019, the ICJ heard arguments on whether to make an interim order for provisional measures\u2014a hearing notorious for the appearance of Nobel Peace Prize laureate and former state counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi<\/a> as agent for Myanmar. The court in January 2020 unanimously ordered<\/a> Myanmar \u2018to take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts\u2019 of genocide (as defined in Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide<\/a>) against the members of the Rohingya group in its territory, and to periodically report to the court on the measures it had taken until a final decision on the case was reached. Myanmar complied<\/a> with the court\u2019s reporting requirements, but in January 2021 filed the objections to the court\u2019s jurisdiction that have just now been resolved.<\/p>\n

In February 2021, the Myanmar military staged a coup<\/a>, which led to the jailing of Suu Kyi and a bloody crackdown on the military\u2019s political opponents and civilians alike. Despite the coup, the case before the ICJ continues, and the military government has, perhaps surprisingly, continued its engagement with the proceedings. Ko Ko Hlaing, minister for international cooperation under the junta, appeared as agent for Myanmar at hearings conducted in February 2022, along with its attorney-general, Thida Oo.<\/p>\n

But the coup may have directly contributed<\/a> to the delay in these proceedings, since the exiled National Unity Government withdrew<\/a> its objections to the ICJ\u2019s hearing the merits of the genocide allegations less than a month after they were filed. Even the ad hoc judge appointed by Myanmar (an option for all states that don\u2019t have a permanent judge at the ICJ) expressed some concerns<\/a> with the court\u2019s decision to allow the military junta to appear in the case.<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, Friday\u2019s decision is a resounding victory for the Gambia. The jurisdiction of the ICJ requires the consent<\/a> of both parties to the dispute, which can be manifested by \u2018matters specially provided for \u2026 in treaties and conventions in force\u2019. In this case, the Gambia and Myanmar are both parties to the Genocide Convention, Article XIII of which provides that disputes relating to the \u2018interpretation, application or fulfilment\u2019 of the treaty can be submitted to the ICJ.<\/p>\n

Myanmar had argued that the Gambia wasn\u2019t the \u2018real\u2019 applicant in the case, but rather that it was the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, an international organisation. Only states can appear before the ICJ, a point that was reiterated by the ICJ president during her opening statement<\/a> when the military government first made its appearance. Myanmar\u2019s second objection was that, because the Gambia had suffered no injury as a result of Myanmar\u2019s treatment of the Rohingya, it lacked standing to bring the case since the Genocide Convention doesn\u2019t provide for the concept of an actio popularis<\/em> (a legal concept meaning that actions can be brought in the public interest). <\/em>It also argued that there was no dispute between the Gambia and Myanmar. A fourth, rather technical argument related to treaty reservations by Myanmar and Bangladesh.<\/p>\n

The ICJ rejected all of these arguments, three unanimously and the other by 15 votes to 1, finding that the Gambia was bringing the case in good faith, and that all of the states parties to the Genocide Convention have a common interest to ensure the prevention, suppression and punishment of genocide. In other words, any state that is a party to the Genocide Convention can bring an action to prevent or punish acts of genocide, even if their nationals are not involved or the acts take place on another territory.<\/p>\n

As the ICJ pointed out<\/a>, to hold otherwise would undermine the protection offered by the convention, because \u2018victims of genocide are often nationals of the state allegedly in breach of its obligations\u2019. This conclusion opens an important door for other states to bring legal action against genocidal regimes worldwide.<\/p>\n

The ICJ\u2019s decision also paves the way for other interested states, such as Canada<\/a>, the UK<\/a>, Maldives and the Netherlands<\/a>, to join in the case and support the Gambia\u2019s legal position. Some states issued a diplomatic statement to that effect within moments of the ICJ\u2019s handing down of its decision.<\/p>\n

Canberra, too, should see this decision as an opportunity to support the Gambia as intervenor and to demonstrate that Australia is once again focused on being a good global citizen with a commitment to human rights, international law, and the Asian region more broadly. Intervention in this matter would go some way towards restoring Australia\u2019s reputation on the global stage.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On Friday, the International Court of Justice announced that it had comprehensively rejected Myanmar\u2019s objections to the continuation of the genocide case brought against it by the Republic of the Gambia over the treatment of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1583,"featured_media":51784,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1084,249,212,25],"class_list":["post-74104","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-genocide","tag-human-rights","tag-myanmar","tag-southeast-asia"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nInternational court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"On Friday, the International Court of Justice announced that it had comprehensively rejected Myanmar\u2019s objections to the continuation of the genocide case brought against it by the Republic of the Gambia over the treatment of ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-07-26T20:00:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-07-26T08:17:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/GettyImages-846713824.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Juliette McIntyre\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Juliette McIntyre\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/GettyImages-846713824.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/GettyImages-846713824.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"COX'S BAZAR, BANGLADESH - SEPTEMBER 13 : A Rohingya Muslim woman, fled from ongoing military operations in Myanmars Rakhine state, gets off a boat while fleeing to a temporary makeshift camp, crossing Naf river, after crossing over from Myanmar into the Bangladesh side of the border, in Shah Porir Dwip near Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh on September 13, 2017. Rohingya Muslims pay local fishers 36 US Dollars in order to cross to Shah Porir Dwip peninsula. As crossings get heavier in the mornings and evenings Bangladeshi soldiers continue operations to take ships, carrying refugees, under control. Violence erupted in Myanmars Rakhine state on Aug. 25 when the countrys security forces launched an operation against the Rohingya Muslim community. It triggered a fresh influx of refugees towards neighboring Bangladesh, though the country sealed off its border to refugees. (Photo by Onur Coban\/Anadolu Agency\/Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/\",\"name\":\"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-07-26T20:00:40+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-07-26T08:17:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd0899414373899c1d09aff8cf0902a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd0899414373899c1d09aff8cf0902a\",\"name\":\"Juliette McIntyre\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b27f9277bb626630bb314dd6aa698416?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b27f9277bb626630bb314dd6aa698416?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Juliette McIntyre\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/juliette-mcintyre\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case | The Strategist","og_description":"On Friday, the International Court of Justice announced that it had comprehensively rejected Myanmar\u2019s objections to the continuation of the genocide case brought against it by the Republic of the Gambia over the treatment of ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2022-07-26T20:00:40+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-07-26T08:17:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/GettyImages-846713824.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Juliette McIntyre","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Juliette McIntyre","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/GettyImages-846713824.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/11\/GettyImages-846713824.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"COX'S BAZAR, BANGLADESH - SEPTEMBER 13 : A Rohingya Muslim woman, fled from ongoing military operations in Myanmars Rakhine state, gets off a boat while fleeing to a temporary makeshift camp, crossing Naf river, after crossing over from Myanmar into the Bangladesh side of the border, in Shah Porir Dwip near Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh on September 13, 2017. Rohingya Muslims pay local fishers 36 US Dollars in order to cross to Shah Porir Dwip peninsula. As crossings get heavier in the mornings and evenings Bangladeshi soldiers continue operations to take ships, carrying refugees, under control. Violence erupted in Myanmars Rakhine state on Aug. 25 when the countrys security forces launched an operation against the Rohingya Muslim community. It triggered a fresh influx of refugees towards neighboring Bangladesh, though the country sealed off its border to refugees. (Photo by Onur Coban\/Anadolu Agency\/Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/","name":"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-07-26T20:00:40+00:00","dateModified":"2022-07-26T08:17:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd0899414373899c1d09aff8cf0902a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/international-court-rejects-myanmars-bid-to-halt-genocide-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"International court rejects Myanmar\u2019s bid to halt genocide case"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd0899414373899c1d09aff8cf0902a","name":"Juliette McIntyre","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b27f9277bb626630bb314dd6aa698416?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b27f9277bb626630bb314dd6aa698416?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Juliette McIntyre"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/juliette-mcintyre\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74104"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1583"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=74104"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74104\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74109,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74104\/revisions\/74109"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/51784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=74104"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=74104"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=74104"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}