{"id":7454,"date":"2013-07-09T06:00:54","date_gmt":"2013-07-08T20:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=7454"},"modified":"2013-07-10T09:21:40","modified_gmt":"2013-07-09T23:21:40","slug":"of-kevin-julia-and-tony-maddies-straights-and-fixers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/of-kevin-julia-and-tony-maddies-straights-and-fixers\/","title":{"rendered":"Of Kevin, Julia and Tony: maddies, straights and fixers"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n To paraphrase Julia Gillard in her farewell press conference, the three categories of \u2018maddy\u2019, \u2018straight\u2019 and \u2018fixer\u2019 do not explain everything about political leaders, but nor do they explain nothing.<\/p>\n As the previous column<\/a> said, we\u2019re indebted to the British politician Tony Benn for getting an immense amount of truth into one dazzling sentence: \u2018All political leaders, irrespective of party, political system, country or period in history, come in one of three categories\u2014straight men, fixers and maddies.\u2019 This model helps us reach towards the truth Walter Lippmann uttered long ago: the supreme qualification for high office is temperament, not intellect. Accepting Lippmann\u2019s assessment, the question becomes what we can know of a leader\u2019s temperament and how that will drive his or her judgement and performance?<\/p>\n The character of leaders is fundamental to any thinking about strategy and strategic choices; no Napoleonic era without Napoleon, no Cold War without Stalin, and probably no containment strategy without Truman. Benn offers a simple but useful tool for thinking about how leaders do what they do.<\/p>\n The maddies push for change and newness, often blowing up what stands in front of them, and they change history. The fixers are the artists of the deals and bargains that are the lifeblood of politics from a dictatorship to a democracy. The Straights are incrementalists whose drives are more firmly grounded and framed than the other two categories, although the frame can be a set of understandings about power as much as any set of moral principles.<\/p>\n This column will assign Julia Gillard, Kevin Rudd and Tony Abbott their categories in the Benn template: Julia is a fixer, Rudd is a straight despite his own party\u2019s attempt to paint him as a maddy, and Tony is, ultimately, a fixer with some of the mannerisms of a maddy. If that’s correct, then this view of his temperament adds further to his chances of winning the federal election. In politics, the fixers win more often than the other two categories.<\/p>\n In a democracy, the great fixers must add a touch of popular magic to their mastery of the machinery. And in the magic department, Julia Gillard couldn\u2019t pull much out of the hat. She prospered in the internal politics of the Labor Party and within the Parliament because her talents as a fixer were of the highest order. Gillard was one of the finest players in a milieu where winning is about doing the deals and sealing the bargains. Her performance in constructing a minority government and then driving it full term was the sustained performance of a virtuoso.<\/p>\n Her problem was that she couldn’t translate her undoubted talents as a political fixer into a broader belief among the voters that she could fix their problems. The Labor model for this is Bob Hawke, one of the great fixers of Australian political history. Gillard \u2018fixed\u2019 Kevin Rudd in the lightning coup of 2010, but was never able to convince the voters to get a positive \u2018fix\u2019 on her.<\/p>\n In restoring Kevin Rudd to the Prime Ministership, the Labor Party has had to accept the judgement of the voters, continually expressed through the opinion polls. Labor saw Rudd as a maddy while the voters think he’s a straight. The voters\u2019 view has prevailed.<\/p>\n The word \u2018dysfunctional\u2019 was applied to Rudd Mark I as much by the public service as by Labor. But that Canberra perspective hasn’t prevailed. The Mark II version has returned because he didn\u2019t blow up while blowing away like a failed maddy. Instead, Rudd showed the steel of a straight man. Like another of Australia\u2019s great straights, Robert Menzies, Rudd’s willed himself to a second go at the top job. All successful politicians have huge reserves of self belief\u2014the line between supreme confidence and various forms of mania can be hazy at the peak. All those qualities, and some of the contradictions, are what make Rudd such a straight to be reckoned with.<\/p>\n Rudd\u2019s determination to return ended Gillard\u2019s political career and shredded the career of many of Labor\u2019s elite in federal parliament; the numbers leaving as Rudd returned testified to the bitterness of the worst leadership schism in Labor since the Split in 1955. To achieve resurrection, Rudd has decimated Labor\u2019s leadership pool; his task now is to see that the voters don\u2019t finish the job.<\/p>\n The Labor Party failed to prove to the electorate that Rudd was a maddy. Now Labor\u2019s new task is to convince the voters that Tony Abbott is<\/i> a maddy. The problem with this strategy is that Abbott is actually a classic fixer with some strong maddy habits of mind. This tension in the Abbot persona puzzles his own party as much as it tantalises Labor; hence Peter Costello\u2019s barb that Abbott is set to become Australia\u2019s first DLP Prime Minister.<\/p>\n