{"id":76275,"date":"2022-11-03T11:00:16","date_gmt":"2022-11-03T00:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=76275"},"modified":"2022-11-03T18:06:30","modified_gmt":"2022-11-03T07:06:30","slug":"the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/","title":{"rendered":"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

In its new national security strategy<\/a>, US President Joe Biden\u2019s administration recognises that Russia and China each present a different kind of challenge. Whereas Russia \u2018poses an immediate threat to the free and open international system \u2026 [with] its brutal war of aggression\u2019, China is the only competitor to the US \u2018with both the intent to reshape the international order and, increasingly, the economic, diplomatic, military, and technological power to advance that objective\u2019. The Pentagon thus refers to China as its \u2018pacing challenge\u2019.<\/p>\n

Now that Chinese President Xi Jinping has used the 20th congress of the Chinese Communist Party to consolidate his power<\/a> and to promote his ideological and nationalist objectives, it is worth reviewing the evolution of America\u2019s China strategy. Some critics see the situation today as proof that presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush were naive to pursue a strategy of engagement<\/a>, including granting China membership in the World Trade Organization. But while there was certainly excessive optimism about China two decades ago, it wasn\u2019t necessarily naive.<\/p>\n

After the Cold War, the US, Japan and China were the three major powers in East Asia, and elementary realism suggested that the US ought to revive its alliance with Japan, rather than discounting it as an outdated relic of the post-World War II era. Long before China was admitted to the WTO in 2001, the Clinton administration had reaffirmed<\/a> the US\u2013Japan alliance, which remains the bedrock of Biden\u2019s strategy.<\/p>\n

Clinton and Bush realised that Cold War-style containment of China would be impossible, because other countries, attracted to the huge Chinese market, would not have gone along with it. So, the US instead sought to create an environment in which China\u2019s rising power would also reshape its behaviour. Continuing Clinton\u2019s policy, the Bush administration tried to coax China to contribute to global public goods and institutions by acting as what then-deputy secretary of state Robert B. Zoellick called<\/a> \u2018a responsible stakeholder\u2019. The policy was to \u2018engage, but hedge<\/a>\u2019. While augmenting a policy of balancing power with engagement obviously did not guarantee Chinese friendship, it did keep alive possible scenarios other than full hostility.<\/p>\n

Was engagement a failure? Cai Xia, a former professor at the CCP\u2019s Central Party School in Beijing, thinks so, arguing<\/a> that the party\u2019s<\/p>\n

fundamental interests and its basic mentality of using the US while remaining hostile to it have not changed over the past 70 years. By contrast, since the 1970s, the two political parties in the United States and the US government have always had unrealistic good wishes for the Chinese communist regime, eagerly hoping that [it] would become more liberal, even democratic, and a \u2018responsible\u2019 power in the world.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Cai is well placed to judge a policy that began with US President Richard Nixon\u2019s visit to China<\/a> in 1972. But some of those who have described engagement as naive ignore the fact that the \u2018hedge\u2019 or insurance policy came first, and that the US\u2013Japan alliance remains robust today.<\/p>\n

Of course, there were some elements of naivete, as when Clinton famously predicted<\/a> that China\u2019s efforts to control the internet would fail. He thought the task would be like \u2018nailing Jell-O to a wall\u2019, but we now know that China\u2019s \u2018great firewall<\/a>\u2019 works quite well. It\u2019s also clear in retrospect that the Bush administration and that of his successor, Barack Obama, should have done more to punish China for its failure to comply<\/a> with the spirit and rules of the WTO.<\/p>\n

In any case, the Xi era has dashed the earlier expectations that rapid economic growth would produce greater liberalisation, if not democratisation. For a while, China allowed greater freedom of travel, more foreign contacts, a wider range of opinions in publications and the development of some civil society organisations, including some devoted to human rights. But all that has now been curtailed.<\/p>\n

Were the basic assumptions of engagement wrong? Before taking office, two of the leading officials responsible for the Biden administration\u2019s new strategy wrote<\/a> that \u2018the basic mistake of engagement was to assume that it could bring about fundamental changes to China\u2019s political system, economy, and foreign policy.\u2019 A more realistic goal, they concluded, is to seek \u2018a steady state of clear-eyed coexistence on terms favorable to US interests and values\u2019.<\/p>\n

On balance, the Biden team is correct about being unable to force fundamental changes in China. In the first decade of this century, China was still moving towards greater openness, moderation and pluralisation. \u2018When Mr. Xi took over in 2012, China was changing fast\u2019, notes<\/a> The Economist<\/em>. \u2018The middle class was growing, private firms were booming, and citizens were connecting on social media. A different leader might have seen these as opportunities. Mr. Xi saw only threats.\u2019<\/p>\n

Even if Xi was the predictable product of a Leninist party system, there remains a question about timing. Modernisation theory\u2014and South Korea\u2019s and Taiwan\u2019s real-world experiences\u2014suggests<\/a> that when per capita annual income approaches US$10,000, a middle class will emerge, and autocracy becomes harder to maintain, compared to the poor peasant society that came before. But how long does this process take? While Marx argued that it took time, Lenin was more impatient and believed that historical developments could be accelerated by a vanguard exercising control over society. Despite Xi\u2019s talk of Marxism-Leninism, it\u2019s clearly Lenin who is prevailing over Marx in today\u2019s China.<\/p>\n

Did the engagement strategy\u2019s mistake lie in expecting meaningful change within two decades, rather than half a century or more? It\u2019s worth remembering that Xi is only the fifth<\/a> leader of the People\u2019s Republic of China. And as the China expert Orville Schell argues<\/a>, it is \u2018patronizing to assume that Chinese citizens will prove content to gain wealth and power alone without those aspects of life that other societies commonly consider fundamental to being human\u2019.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, policymakers are always under time pressure and must formulate strategic objectives for the here and now. Biden has properly done that. The question for the years ahead is whether he can implement his policies in ways that do not foreclose the possibility of more benign future scenarios, even while recognising that they are distant.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In its new national security strategy, US President Joe Biden\u2019s administration recognises that Russia and China each present a different kind of challenge. Whereas Russia \u2018poses an immediate threat to the free and open international …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":500,"featured_media":76280,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1383,52,31,2070],"class_list":["post-76275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-ccp","tag-china","tag-united-states","tag-us-foreign-policy"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe evolution of America\u2019s China strategy | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In its new national security strategy, US President Joe Biden\u2019s administration recognises that Russia and China each present a different kind of challenge. Whereas Russia \u2018poses an immediate threat to the free and open international ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-03T00:00:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-03T07:06:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/GettyImages-53376219.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"667\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Joseph S. Nye\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Joseph S. Nye\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/GettyImages-53376219.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/GettyImages-53376219.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":667,\"caption\":\"CHINA - 1998: US President Bill Clinton (C) smiling as he conducts band with baton while wife Hillary (yellow dress) talks with Chinese PM Jiang Zemin during Clinton's trip to strengthens foreign policy ties. (Photo by Cynthia Johnson\/Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/\",\"name\":\"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-03T00:00:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-03T07:06:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/edb0a4c6105071db2b5d7d716d4d7eed\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/edb0a4c6105071db2b5d7d716d4d7eed\",\"name\":\"Joseph S. Nye\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e5157ecfa6b59807d2cf04084bc0ed9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e5157ecfa6b59807d2cf04084bc0ed9?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Joseph S. Nye\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/joseph-s-nye-jr\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy | The Strategist","og_description":"In its new national security strategy, US President Joe Biden\u2019s administration recognises that Russia and China each present a different kind of challenge. Whereas Russia \u2018poses an immediate threat to the free and open international ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2022-11-03T00:00:16+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-11-03T07:06:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":667,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/GettyImages-53376219.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Joseph S. Nye","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Joseph S. Nye","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/GettyImages-53376219.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/GettyImages-53376219.jpg","width":1024,"height":667,"caption":"CHINA - 1998: US President Bill Clinton (C) smiling as he conducts band with baton while wife Hillary (yellow dress) talks with Chinese PM Jiang Zemin during Clinton's trip to strengthens foreign policy ties. (Photo by Cynthia Johnson\/Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/","name":"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-11-03T00:00:16+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-03T07:06:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/edb0a4c6105071db2b5d7d716d4d7eed"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-evolution-of-americas-china-strategy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The evolution of America\u2019s China strategy"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/edb0a4c6105071db2b5d7d716d4d7eed","name":"Joseph S. Nye","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e5157ecfa6b59807d2cf04084bc0ed9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3e5157ecfa6b59807d2cf04084bc0ed9?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Joseph S. Nye"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/joseph-s-nye-jr\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76275"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/500"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76275"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76320,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76275\/revisions\/76320"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/76280"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}