{"id":76657,"date":"2022-11-21T06:00:15","date_gmt":"2022-11-20T19:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=76657"},"modified":"2022-11-20T21:30:57","modified_gmt":"2022-11-20T10:30:57","slug":"australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Australian<\/figure>\n

The Labor government has given a \u2018firm\u2019<\/a> view to the parliamentary inquiry on war powers<\/a>: don\u2019t disturb the executive\u2019s prerogative for sending Australia to war.<\/p>\n

But the reference letter<\/a> to the committee says there\u2019s room for more parliamentary scrutiny.<\/p>\n

My positive reading of the two positions is that the inquiry has the chance to use parliamentary precedent to strengthen the Westminster system. Drawing on a series of columns I\u2019ve written on the war powers, here is a four-part plan.<\/p>\n

1. Codify parliamentary precedent to establish a set of conventions:<\/strong> use conventions, not law, to give parliament a proper role in Australia\u2019s way of war.<\/p>\n

Invoking precedent, convention and tradition is a means to establish legitimacy, set standards and guide future actions.<\/p>\n

A small example is a mythic sign on a university noticeboard: \u2018College tradition is that students do not walk on the grass in the main quadrangle. This tradition begins today.\u2019 The sign has AAA provenance (apocryphal and anonymous), yet it illustrates the truth that tradition is a useful tool.<\/p>\n

As the historian Eric Hobsbawm<\/a> noted, \u2018\u201cTraditions\u201d which appear or claim to be old are often quite recent in origin and sometimes invented.\u2019<\/p>\n

The Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade doesn\u2019t have to invent tradition, merely codify precedents set by previous prime ministers and governments. The purpose is to make these precedents conventions to be followed by future governments.<\/p>\n

Turning to convention is a means around the two major parties\u2019 aversion to changing the law, to give parliament a place in the use of the war powers.<\/p>\n

The call for both houses of parliament to vote on war crashes against the fact that Australian governments seldom command a majority in the Senate. Neither Labor nor the Coalition will give another iota of power to the upper house.<\/p>\n

A convention for a vote in the lower house on deploying the Australian Defence Force already exists. The inquiry should note the precedent in the House of Representatives and call on future governments to follow it.<\/p>\n

2. A vote of the House of Representatives: <\/strong>adopt the precedent set by Prime Minister John Howard with his ANZUS and Iraq resolutions.<\/p>\n

The ANZUS precedent is the eight-point motion that Howard\u00a0moved in the House<\/a>\u00a0on 17 September 2001, invoking the ANZUS Treaty following the 9\/11 terror attacks on the US.<\/p>\n

The motion didn\u2019t go to the military actions that followed, but set out fundamental arguments for why Australia would act. That\u2019s the place to start for all future motions on military action: state the principles and purposes.<\/p>\n

A resolution for war should be considered by the House even if\u2014as happened with Iraq\u2014the government has already sent Australia\u2019s military to fight.<\/p>\n

Howard created the National Security Committee of cabinet, which is established at the heart of government. In the same way, the Howard precedent on a House resolution for war\u2014before or after deployment\u2014should be treated as a valuable convention in our Westminster system.<\/p>\n

Governments are made in the House of Representatives, while the Senate is the house of review. The House of Representatives is where the vote on war should happen.<\/p>\n

3. The mission and the means:<\/strong> set out the aims, the role of the ADF, the risks and Australia\u2019s objectives\u2014following the precedents of prime ministers Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard.<\/p>\n

Howard\u2019s ANZUS and Iraq resolutions are starting points for future deployment resolutions. Building on the Howard convention, the government should present the House with a motion that offers answers to the fundamental questions posed by Abbott on 1 September 2014.<\/p>\n

In a\u00a0statement to parliament<\/a>\u00a0on the threat that \u2018the death cult\u2019 Islamic State posed to Iraq and Syria, Abbott said that if a request for Australian military help in Iraq came from the US and the Iraqi government, it would be considered against these criteria: \u2018Is there a clear and achievable overall objective? Is there a clear and proportionate role for Australian forces? Have all the risks been properly assessed? And is there an overall humanitarian objective in accordance with Australia\u2019s national interests?\u2019<\/p>\n

For a war against another nation, rather than terrorists, other big questions could be added to the Abbott criteria: What is the scope of the commitment? What are the aims? What forces are needed? What would victory would look like? What is the exit strategy?<\/p>\n

Add to the Abbott points the set of questions outlined by Gillard\u00a0in her Afghanistan speech<\/a>\u00a0on 19 October 2010. Gillard told parliament that she would \u2018answer five questions Australians are asking about the war\u2019:<\/p>\n

\u2013 why Australia is involved in Afghanistan;
\n\u2013 what the international community is seeking to achieve and how;
\n\u2013 what Australia\u2019s contribution is to this international effort\u2014our mission;
\n\u2013 what progress is being made; and
\n\u2013 what the future is of our commitment in Afghanistan.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The resolution that goes to the House, even if the government has already ordered war, should address those fundamentals\u2014the aims, the means and the ends.<\/p>\n

4. Answer to parliament and the people: <\/strong>require the prime minister and defence minister to give parliament (and Australia) regular formal reports on the conflict. Revive the convention that major government statements on Australian strategy and defence should be presented and tabled in parliament.<\/p>\n

A significant precedent in Gillard\u2019s\u00a0Afghanistan speech was her promise of regular formal statements to parliament: \u2018[T]oday I announce as Prime Minister that I will make a statement like this one to the House each year that our Afghanistan involvement continues. This will be in addition to the continuing ministerial statements by the Minister for Defence in each session of the parliament.\u2019<\/p>\n

While building fresh conventions on parliament\u2019s role, it\u2019s time to revive conventions that have been so ignored they\u2019ve fallen into disuse. Major government announcements on defence and strategy should be presented and tabled in parliament. That was the convention that prevailed from the first defence white paper in 1976, then in 1987 and 1994, and again when Howard presented his defence white paper to the House<\/a> in 2000.<\/p>\n

In this century, however, parliament is bypassed in order to serve the TV cameras.<\/p>\n

Defence white papers haven\u2019t been presented in parliament. Instead, they\u2019ve been unveiled on a navy ship at Garden Island in Sydney (Kevin Rudd), in an air force hangar in front of a fighter jet and two lines of ADF uniformed personnel (Gillard) or at the Australian Defence Force Academy (Malcolm Turnbull). Turnbull\u2019s 2017 foreign policy white paper was released in the foyer of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, while Scott Morrison went to ADFA to release the 2020 defence strategic update. The politics and pictures of these performances were presidential, not parliamentary.<\/p>\n

Governments have developed an absent-minded habit of not bothering to make policy documents also papers of the parliament.<\/p>\n

A test of the government\u2019s view of parliament will be whether the defence strategic review to be released next year is presented to the TV cameras or tabled and debated in the House of Representatives.<\/p>\n

The parliament must do more work if it\u2019s to have more say and play a more consistent and continuing role in thinking about the nation\u2019s defence. To have a greater voice in the Australian way of war, parliament should do more of the thinking.<\/p>\n

The joint committee should hold regular hearings to review Australian military missions (monitor the checklist). And building on Senate estimates, in each parliament the joint committee should review Australian strategy and defence equipment programs.<\/p>\n

Taking recent precedents and codifying them as conventions means the parliament could test policy, shape thinking and record the detail that makes the history. Building such tradition grounds the issues of trust and democratic legitimacy where it belongs, in our parliament.<\/p>\n

In war, a government must convince its own people; it must give reasons for the sacrifice, make sense of the death. As ever, parliament must be where the power and the policy meet the people.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Labor government has given a \u2018firm\u2019 view to the parliamentary inquiry on war powers: don\u2019t disturb the executive\u2019s prerogative for sending Australia to war. But the reference letter to the committee says there\u2019s room …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":15774,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[416,399,939],"class_list":["post-76657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australian-government","tag-parliament","tag-war-power"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAustralia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Labor government has given a \u2018firm\u2019 view to the parliamentary inquiry on war powers: don\u2019t disturb the executive\u2019s prerogative for sending Australia to war. But the reference letter to the committee says there\u2019s room ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-20T19:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-20T10:30:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/6769187101_69d2ceaebf_z.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"427\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/6769187101_69d2ceaebf_z.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/6769187101_69d2ceaebf_z.jpg\",\"width\":640,\"height\":427,\"caption\":\"Australian House of Representatives - Canberra\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/\",\"name\":\"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-20T19:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-20T10:30:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\",\"name\":\"Graeme Dobell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graeme Dobell\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions | The Strategist","og_description":"The Labor government has given a \u2018firm\u2019 view to the parliamentary inquiry on war powers: don\u2019t disturb the executive\u2019s prerogative for sending Australia to war. But the reference letter to the committee says there\u2019s room ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2022-11-20T19:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-11-20T10:30:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":427,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/6769187101_69d2ceaebf_z.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graeme Dobell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graeme Dobell","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/6769187101_69d2ceaebf_z.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/09\/6769187101_69d2ceaebf_z.jpg","width":640,"height":427,"caption":"Australian House of Representatives - Canberra"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/","name":"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2022-11-20T19:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-20T10:30:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australias-war-powers-codify-precedents-to-create-conventions\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australia\u2019s war powers: codify precedents to create conventions"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f","name":"Graeme Dobell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graeme Dobell"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76657"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=76657"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76657\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":76659,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/76657\/revisions\/76659"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=76657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=76657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=76657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}