{"id":77745,"date":"2023-02-06T10:00:06","date_gmt":"2023-02-05T23:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=77745"},"modified":"2023-02-06T09:47:55","modified_gmt":"2023-02-05T22:47:55","slug":"australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

The Albanese government deserves credit for its handling of the China relationship. Its dual-stream strategy of \u2018co-operating where possible and disagreeing where necessary\u2019 has so far enabled diplomatic re-engagement without compromising Australian policy. But is the approach sustainable, or is it only feasible when the streams do not cross?<\/p>\n

The government, and in particular Foreign Minister Penny Wong, has wisely referred not to a \u2018reset\u2019 but a \u2018stabilising\u2019 of relations. But what does stability mean in the long term? For Australia, it means making routine the protection of national sovereignty and adherence to international rules. Beijing, however, will seek a stability that means no new Australian policies it regards as \u2018anti-China\u2019.<\/p>\n

These objectives are not compatible, which means either we need to live with ongoing tension and intermittent disagreements, or one country compromises on its strategic interests.<\/p>\n

A test of the approach\u2019s sustainability was inevitable\u2014and in fact it has already arrived. In 2021, Australia launched two World Trade Organization cases against China relating to wine and barley, which were among the exports Beijing targeted in a series of coercive trade strikes aimed at getting the Australian government to change its policies on non-trade issues such as the South China Sea, foreign interference, 5G, human rights, Taiwan and Covid-19.<\/p>\n

Beijing has suggested that it might end its spurious trade measures if Australia drops its WTO cases. This would be a major mistake by Australia and would constitute the first backward step on Australian policy\u2014an unacceptable Rubicon that would signal Canberra is prepared to put short-term economic gain ahead of sovereignty and international rules.<\/p>\n

Trade Minister Don Farrell told The Australian<\/em> in late December that Australia preferred to resolve the disputes \u2018by discussion\u2019 than by WTO arbitration, and even referred to the possibility of Beijing\u2019s reducing its coercion as\u00a0\u2018goodwill\u2019\u2014an unfortunate phrase suggesting that Australia might even return such goodwill.<\/p>\n

The measures have both been in place for more than two years. That\u2019s more than two years of unjustified economic loss that we do not get back.<\/p>\n

A simple abandonment of the disputes through a deal outside of the WTO would mean China faces no consequences for its coercive behaviour. It would signal to international vandals that they can trash the rules and then, when their outlaw behaviour doesn\u2019t pay off, simply walk away.<\/p>\n

As a country that believes in a system of rules\u2014both because it reflects our values and because it protects our national interests\u2014Australia should be setting an example: unfair trade practices need to be properly dealt with by adjudication and the costs properly accounted for.<\/p>\n

True, the WTO encourages parties to resolve disputes themselves. But this is only the best course if resolution is managed quickly, not when one party has inflicted years of unjustified cost on the other. There is an understandable desire to end the pain for affected wine and barley producers. But the WTO is expected to rule on the cases by the middle of this year, so there is no strong argument on pragmatic grounds that we should just cut our losses.<\/p>\n

Many observers have no faith in the WTO. But that shows the need for responsible nations such as Australia to take action and support reforms that make international institutions more effective, which in turn means showing confidence that the institutions can work.<\/p>\n

Granted, the penalty system is not perfect. But the real consequence for Beijing would be at a higher level. The reputational cost of a finding against China by an international institution would be more powerful than a single country\u2019s claim alone, and it would galvanise international support for rules and disincentivise future coercive tactics.<\/p>\n

We should look at the example Japan set after Beijing halted shipments of rare earths in 2010, in an attempt to coerce Tokyo over the disputed Senkaku Islands while also giving Chinese companies a competitive advantage in products such as hybrid car batteries.<\/p>\n

After diversifying its sources of rare earths to avert a manufacturing crisis\u2014and to make sure the coercion couldn\u2019t be repeated in the future\u2014Japan still went through with a WTO case. The WTO found in Japan\u2019s favour and China was forced to drop its export restrictions.<\/p>\n

These trade disputes aren\u2019t just about the economic relationship. Trade is inseparable from strategy and security. China itself has demonstrated this by using trade to \u00adcoerce Australia over sovereign decisions it made in other realms.<\/p>\n

And this year will not be a year in which Australia can hide from the truth of its strategic circumstances. The defence strategic review and the decision on the \u00adoptimal pathway for Australia\u2019s nuclear-propelled submarine are both responses to China\u2019s aggressive rise.<\/p>\n

Our diplomacy should not suggest otherwise. In international affairs, a good cop (foreign ministry), bad cop (defence ministry) routine does not work. All it does is project inconsistency that authoritarian regimes can exploit.<\/p>\n

The forecast investment in defence capabilities and technology is vital for our \u00adfuture. There must be a complementary and overarching narrative that brings the public\u2014here and abroad\u2014along for what will, at times, be a bumpy ride.<\/p>\n

Japan, as this year\u2019s G7 host, has made it clear economic coercion will be a major item at the summit in Hiroshima in May. Our partners and allies\u2014many of whom have also experienced Beijing\u2019s economic coercion\u2014will be watching more closely than ever.<\/p>\n

Consistency is essential, and that means passing this test on trade. A strategic win for Beijing would likely nudge us on to a path on which we become tempted to speak more softly or even self-censor on Chinese transgressions, whether they be in the Taiwan Strait or Xinjiang, or cyberattacks and foreign interference. This can quickly push leaders and policymakers into the habit of second-guessing or delaying policies that are in our national interest but might upset Beijing. Once you are in this position, it is hard to get out.<\/p>\n

Withdrawal from the WTO cases without consequences for Beijing would also involve Australia withdrawing from our international leadership because it would boost the likelihood that Beijing repeats its coercion against other, smaller nations.<\/p>\n

Above all, dropping the cases would mean Australia is no longer able to say the government\u2019s approach to China has not involved any major change to foreign, defence or strategic policies. The precedent will be set that \u00adpolicy can be changed to appease Beijing.<\/p>\n

Like it or not, strategic competition is here. We are competing for the shape of the evolving regional and international system\u2014of which fundamental principles such as trading fairly according to rules that apply to all economies is a central feature.<\/p>\n

If Australia chooses not to participate, we forgo our chance to have an influence. The competition will continue without us, and our future will be in the hands of others, including those who are ready to take advantage of any weakness.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Albanese government deserves credit for its handling of the China relationship. Its dual-stream strategy of \u2018co-operating where possible and disagreeing where necessary\u2019 has so far enabled diplomatic re-engagement without compromising Australian policy. But is …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1559,"featured_media":77747,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,2212,3211,285,549,365],"class_list":["post-77745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia","tag-australia-china-relations","tag-coercion","tag-foreign-policy","tag-strategic-policy","tag-trade"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAustralia must stand firm on trade disputes with China | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Albanese government deserves credit for its handling of the China relationship. Its dual-stream strategy of \u2018co-operating where possible and disagreeing where necessary\u2019 has so far enabled diplomatic re-engagement without compromising Australian policy. But is ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-05T23:00:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-02-05T22:47:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/GettyImages-803899922.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Justin Bassi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Justin Bassi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/GettyImages-803899922.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/GettyImages-803899922.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"China's President Xi Jinping takes a glass of wine from a waiter as he makes a toast during a banquet in Hong Kong on June 30, 2017. China's President Xi Jinping addressed a celebratory banquet including lawmakers and business figures Friday evening, praising the city for its role in China's economic development. \/ AFP PHOTO \/ POOL \/ DALE DE LA REY (Photo credit should read DALE DE LA REY\/AFP via Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/\",\"name\":\"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-05T23:00:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-02-05T22:47:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321\",\"name\":\"Justin Bassi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Justin Bassi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/justin-bassi\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China | The Strategist","og_description":"The Albanese government deserves credit for its handling of the China relationship. Its dual-stream strategy of \u2018co-operating where possible and disagreeing where necessary\u2019 has so far enabled diplomatic re-engagement without compromising Australian policy. But is ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2023-02-05T23:00:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-02-05T22:47:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/GettyImages-803899922.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Justin Bassi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Justin Bassi","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/GettyImages-803899922.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/GettyImages-803899922.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"China's President Xi Jinping takes a glass of wine from a waiter as he makes a toast during a banquet in Hong Kong on June 30, 2017. China's President Xi Jinping addressed a celebratory banquet including lawmakers and business figures Friday evening, praising the city for its role in China's economic development. \/ AFP PHOTO \/ POOL \/ DALE DE LA REY (Photo credit should read DALE DE LA REY\/AFP via Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/","name":"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2023-02-05T23:00:06+00:00","dateModified":"2023-02-05T22:47:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/australia-must-stand-firm-on-trade-disputes-with-china\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Australia must stand firm on trade disputes with China"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/5e2d55ef0c16714833ccf2506197d321","name":"Justin Bassi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ae57bc3216539100523eaf6e0cdfea1c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Justin Bassi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/justin-bassi\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77745"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1559"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=77745"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77745\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":77748,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/77745\/revisions\/77748"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/77747"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=77745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=77745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=77745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}