{"id":80161,"date":"2023-06-05T06:00:14","date_gmt":"2023-06-04T20:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=80161"},"modified":"2023-06-04T19:04:25","modified_gmt":"2023-06-04T09:04:25","slug":"the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/","title":{"rendered":"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

In the Taiwan Strait on Saturday, a Chinese People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy ship and a US Navy ship came within 150 yards of a collision<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The US says<\/a> the Chinese warship crossed the bow of the US destroyer in an \u2018unsafe\u2019 manoeuvre that \u2018violated the maritime \u201crules of the road\u201d of safe passage in international waters\u2019.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s defence minister, General Li Shangfu, retorted that the US was being provocative and its ship should not have been there. He advised the Americans to \u2018mind your own business\u2019.<\/p>\n

A clash of intents and interests could have cost lives and sparked a superpower confrontation.<\/p>\n

The near miss at sea framed the US\u2013China failures on display at Asia\u2019s premier security dialogue taking place at the same time in Singapore.<\/p>\n

At the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore over the weekend, China and the US talked at each other but didn\u2019t actually talk.<\/p>\n

The stakes are so high, yet the actual US\u2013China dialogue at Shangri-La is so small. Plenty of words. Well-rehearsed statements of positions and pointed accusations. But not much listening and little exchange.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s why Anthony Albanese made the centrepiece of his keynote address<\/a> to the dialogue on Friday the need for more talking in the Indo-Pacific<\/a> and guardrails \u2018to prevent a worst-case scenario\u2019. The prime minister was speaking just before a version of that scenario nearly unfolded at sea.<\/p>\n

When Li addressed the dialogue on Sunday, he said China had no problem with innocent passage for trade: \u2018We have never hurt any of those ships. However, we do see some ships [from] outside the region exercise hegemony of navigation.\u2019<\/p>\n

The first two questions the minister faced were about the \u2018dangerous and unprofessional\u2019 Chinese actions in the Taiwan Strait and why China was refusing military-to-military talks with the US to establish crisis communications. Li\u2019s pushback was that China would respond to provocation. His speech had the usual Chinese boilerplate: Taiwan is Chinese. One-China policy. Internal issue.<\/p>\n

At the end of the session, the director-general of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, John Chipman, asked a wrap-up question about Chinese ships and planes causing near misses. Li responded:<\/p>\n

We have codes for encounters at sea and air reached with many other countries to prevent unnecessary dangers. But I want to also raise a question on the incidents you mention. Why did all those incidents happen in areas near China, not in areas near other countries? I think that is because Chinese air or navy vessels do not do access near other countries. To truly prevent such incidents in the future, we do not only need the codes we have. The best way is for other countries\u2019 planes and ships not to do actions around other countries.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Li\u2019s sum-up advice to the US and its allies was his bumper-sticker line: \u2018Mind your own business.\u2019<\/p>\n

The strange element in the verbal push and shove is that the Chinese minister declined the chance in Singapore to deliver his message face to face with his US counterpart.<\/p>\n

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin did manage to walk up and shake hands with Li. For Chinese officials, that unscripted moment was a handshake ambush. So even a handshake can get a negative read. And the handshake was the limit of personal contact, as Austin lamented<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Dialogue is not a reward. It is a necessity.\u00a0And a cordial handshake over dinner is no substitute for a substantive engagement.\u00a0And the more that we talk, the more that we can avoid the misunderstandings and miscalculations that could lead to crisis or conflict.\u00a0You know, I am deeply concerned that the PRC has been unwilling to engage more seriously on better mechanisms for crisis management between our two militaries. But I hope that will change, and soon.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Speaking just before the ship incident, Austin pointed to an \u2018alarming number\u2019 of risky Chinese intercepts of \u2018US and allied aircraft flying lawfully in international airspace\u2019.<\/p>\n

In his speech, he warned five times against coercion and added three references to bullying. \u2018All of this is especially important in the Taiwan Strait,\u2019 he said. The US would categorically oppose unilateral changes to the status quo from China or Taiwan:<\/p>\n

I\u2019d also highlight that conflict is neither imminent or inevitable. Deterrence is strong today\u2014and it\u2019s our job to keep it that way.\u00a0You know, the whole world has a stake in maintaining peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait\u2014the whole world. The security of commercial shipping lanes and global supply chains depends on it. And so does freedom of navigation worldwide.\u00a0But make no mistake: conflict in the Taiwan Strait would be devastating.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Albanese offered a similar warning, saying the consequences of a breakdown in the Taiwan Strait \u2018would not be confined to the big powers or the site of their conflict; they would be devastating for the world.\u2019<\/p>\n

As the dialogue\u2019s host, the International Institute for Strategic Studies offers an overview of trends with its annual Asia\u2013Pacific security assessment<\/a>. Nigel Inkster\u2019s chapter, \u2018Strained US\u2013China relations and the growing threat to Taiwan\u2019<\/a>, argues that Beijing\u2019s goal of \u2018reunification\u2019 with Taiwan by the PRC centenary in 2049 is still only an aspiration. Claims by US military leaders that China may use military force against Taiwan in the next few years, he says, are based not on \u2018firm intelligence\u2019 but an assessment of when China will have the military capability for an attack.<\/p>\n

Inkster notes the estimate that a war in the Taiwan Strait would cause an immediate US$2 trillion hit to the global economy, and concludes:<\/p>\n

It is impossible to determine whether China will use force to take Taiwan at some point in the future. Such force might take a variety of forms, ranging from a contested amphibious assault to concerted missile attacks and bombardments or a naval blockade. China has prepared for all these options, including via \u2018lawfare\u2019 by claiming that the Taiwan Strait is not an international waterway. In any case, the decision on whether to resort to armed force is arguably no longer just in China\u2019s hands; rather, it has become a function of the dynamic that has evolved between Beijing and Washington.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Ships dicing in the Taiwan Strait carry a trillion-dollar price tag as well as the risk of war. The US and China have much to talk about. A handshake ambush is better than being ambushed by history.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the Taiwan Strait on Saturday, a Chinese People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy ship and a US Navy ship came within 150 yards of a collision. The US says the Chinese warship crossed the bow of …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":80173,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2212,52,471,2380],"class_list":["post-80161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia-china-relations","tag-china","tag-south-china-sea","tag-us-china-relations"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the Taiwan Strait on Saturday, a Chinese People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy ship and a US Navy ship came within 150 yards of a collision. The US says the Chinese warship crossed the bow of ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-06-04T20:00:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-06-04T09:04:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/GettyImages-1258416974.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/GettyImages-1258416974.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/GettyImages-1258416974.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"China's Minister of National Defence Li Shangfu delivers a speech during the 20th Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore on June 4, 2023. (Photo by Roslan RAHMAN \/ AFP) (Photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN\/AFP via Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/\",\"name\":\"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-06-04T20:00:14+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-06-04T09:04:25+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\",\"name\":\"Graeme Dobell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graeme Dobell\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations | The Strategist","og_description":"In the Taiwan Strait on Saturday, a Chinese People\u2019s Liberation Army Navy ship and a US Navy ship came within 150 yards of a collision. The US says the Chinese warship crossed the bow of ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2023-06-04T20:00:14+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-06-04T09:04:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/GettyImages-1258416974.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graeme Dobell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graeme Dobell","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/GettyImages-1258416974.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/GettyImages-1258416974.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"China's Minister of National Defence Li Shangfu delivers a speech during the 20th Shangri-La Dialogue summit in Singapore on June 4, 2023. (Photo by Roslan RAHMAN \/ AFP) (Photo by ROSLAN RAHMAN\/AFP via Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/","name":"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2023-06-04T20:00:14+00:00","dateModified":"2023-06-04T09:04:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-choppy-seas-and-non-dialogue-of-us-china-relations\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The choppy seas and non-dialogue of US\u2013China relations"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f","name":"Graeme Dobell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graeme Dobell"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80161"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80161"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80176,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80161\/revisions\/80176"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/80173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}