{"id":80908,"date":"2023-07-04T14:00:19","date_gmt":"2023-07-04T04:00:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=80908"},"modified":"2023-07-04T13:56:55","modified_gmt":"2023-07-04T03:56:55","slug":"pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/","title":{"rendered":"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Security agreements are an increasingly hot topic in the Pacific as Australia, the US, China and New Zealand seek broad arrangements across the region. Melanesian countries have attracted the most attention; over the past 15 months, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Vanuatu and Solomon Islands have each signed agreements with at least one partner. Some have been in development for years, and some of those build on previous agreements. Existing and developing agreements are under scrutiny to ensure they are fit for purpose but are also\u00a0inevitably\u2014and sometimes justifiably\u2014viewed through the lens of strategic competition. Australia\u2019s commitment to respectful and reciprocal security engagement is contingent on nurturing relationships, listening to the needs of our Pacific partners, and adapting to new challenges.<\/p>\n

On 1 June, Prime Minister James Marape announced that Papua New Guinea wasn\u2019t ready to sign the bilateral security treaty it has been working on with Australia due to concerns<\/a> that the wording encroached on PNG\u2019s sovereignty. The treaty was planned as part of the PNG\u2013Australia Comprehensive Strategic and Economic Partnership signed in August 2020<\/a>. In January it was announced<\/a> that negotiations would hopefully conclude in April for a signing in June. This timeline should have been viewed as aspirational at best, and Marape\u2019s postponement hasn\u2019t come out of nowhere.<\/p>\n

Only a few weeks earlier, PNG Defence Minister Win Daki signed a security agreement with the US<\/a>, stirring protests<\/a> by PNG university students and the raising of sovereignty concerns by commentators who saw a leaked early draft. PNG and the US have since made the agreement public, demonstrating transparency and signalling that the agreement is intended to provide better support for PNG. It will still need to be debated in PNG\u2019s parliament to be ratified, and that will take time. The US having open access to PNG\u2019s military facilities has landed easily in Australia because the US is our friend; had PNG\u2019s agreement been reached with China instead of the US, it would have sent shockwaves across Canberra. And the agreement\u2019s comprehensiveness reflects the deep strategic preparations going on in Washington.<\/p>\n

The public criticism of the US\u2013PNG agreement wouldn\u2019t have been lost on Marape. His caution may indicate that his government did listen and will ensure that the Australian treaty\u2019s language is appropriate and isn\u2019t seen to encroach<\/a> on sovereign rights. The PNG government wants to ensure that this agreement works best for the country and doesn\u2019t affect its sovereignty. Australia wholeheartedly supports\u2014or at least should support\u2014attention being paid to any international agreement. It\u2019s not something to be rushed, and it\u2019s certainly not a race. To alleviate any concerns when the details are agreed, Australia should work closely with the media alongside the PNG government to explain what the treaty is, how it differs from past arrangements and agreements, and how both countries will benefit.<\/p>\n

The PNG government\u2019s hesitancy does not represent a failure in the bilateral relationship. Australia and PNG are friends for the long haul and their security relationship is deep, enduring and substantial for both nations. That shouldn\u2019t be forgotten as they exercise patience to get things right.<\/p>\n

The bilateral security treaties and agreements Australia is pursuing across the Pacific are being treated as treaty-level arrangements. They are the highest and most formal of agreements\u2014and they must be ratified by parliament and registered<\/a> with the United Nations. The UN maintains a treaty collection<\/a> and its charter states that any member entering into a treaty should register it with the UN to ensure that it carries weight under international law. For Australia, these arrangements may bestow \u2018partner of choice\u2019 status, but not all partners will put agreements on the same pedestal as treaties.<\/p>\n

On 28 June, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Manasseh Sogavare said that his country\u2019s security agreement with Australia would be reviewed<\/a> to take into account the changing security challenges faced by both countries. Although this agreement is Australia\u2019s longest standing and perhaps most successful bilateral security treaty in the region, in a rapidly changing environment, sometimes a refresh is necessary. The Australia\u2013Solomon Islands agreement was the first of its kind in the Pacific and was signed in 2017 to follow the Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands.<\/p>\n

Australia\u2019s response during the 2021 Honiara riots was an example of a bilateral security treaty being used to its full potential. It was designed with the ability to incorporate other partners into security responses, so New Zealand and Fiji also assisted Solomon Islands under Australia\u2019s arrangement.<\/p>\n

Ironically, the effectiveness of Australia\u2019s support under this treaty may have encouraged the Solomon Islands government to formalise its security agreement with China. That agreement allows Solomon Islands to call on China\u2019s security forces in times of instability and provides Sogavare<\/a> with an alternative to the West. The details of the Solomon Islands\u2013China agreement have not been made public\u2014a stark indication of China\u2019s intent.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s agreement doesn\u2019t have the same protections by the UN as Australia\u2019s treaties. And secret wording in secret agreements leaves much to interpretation. The people of Solomon Islands and other foreign partners have been left with unanswered questions and grave concerns about what the arrangement may mean for future engagement between the two countries. By contrast, if Australia and Solomon Islands update their security agreement, it will undoubtedly be public and transparent.<\/p>\n

Australia and Vanuatu<\/a> are also progressing a security agreement that was signed in December 2022. Vanuatu\u2019s Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau has indicated that he\u2019ll ask parliament to ratify it this year. Although the agreement is designed to streamline Australian assistance and enhance cooperation across a wide range of security areas, and while it will ultimately deliver clear benefits to Vanuatu, it will likely remain controversial.<\/p>\n

Sovereignty concerns arising from the agreement were among the issues raised during attempts to remove<\/a> Kalsakau from power this year. While the call for Kalsakau to go was withdrawn, it demonstrated the weight placed on geopolitical competition and security in Vanuatu. The agreement has been made public, but little effort has been made in Vanuatu to explain its intent and its benefits. Australia should encourage discussion on security cooperation by the Vanuatu government and in the media.<\/p>\n

In October 2022, Australia and Fiji signed<\/a> a status of forces agreement, or SOFA. It is simpler than a bilateral security agreement and provides a legal framework to cover practical issues for visiting military forces, including customs procedures and criminal and civil jurisdiction.\u00a0The agreement will make many activities easier, as in Operation Bushfire Assist, when 54 members of Bula Force<\/a> comprising members of the Republic of Fiji Military Forces and Fiji\u2019s National Fire Authority deployed to Australia. Last week, New Zealand and Fiji announced their own status of forces agreement, along with a reaffirmation of their security partnership. SOFAs serve their own unique and practical purpose but can lead to more comprehensive partnerships. The US\u2013PNG security agreement was said to simply elevate their existing SOFA. But these are very different types of arrangements.<\/p>\n

Beneath these agreements lie memoranda of understanding, or MoUs\u2014the simplest international display of friendship and cooperation and essentially a handshake deal written down. MoUs are often precursors to greater, formalised cooperation and agreements but tend to fizzle out or under-deliver if the attention or will of either party shifts.<\/p>\n

MoUs should spark curiosity more than concern but remain a good indicator of intent. Any bilateral arrangement should exist to steer existing friendships towards more efficient and beneficial activities. Thorough consultation is vital, as China learned when it tried, and failed, to secure a regional security agreement<\/a> with 10 Pacific island countries in May 2022.<\/p>\n

Regardless of the status of its bilateral security agreements and negotiations, Australia has deep defence and security relationships across the Pacific, thanks in no small part to its widely successful and extremely well-funded defence cooperation programs. These include the Pacific Maritime Support Program<\/a>, which has delivered dozens of patrol boats to protect exclusive economic zones, counter illegal fishing and support disaster relief operations.<\/p>\n

Australian Defence Force officers are embedded across regional defence forces and, as announced on 2 May, PNG Defence Force personnel will be embedded<\/a> with the ADF. Our defence relationship with Fiji has kept us connected\u2014through co-deployments into the region for stability operations and disaster relief, through Australia\u2019s infrastructure assistance including to Fiji\u2019s Blackrock defence facility, and through a comprehensive maritime capability relationship.<\/p>\n

With Australia\u2019s security engagement and relationships so entwined across the region, a transparent bilateral treaty coming from a true and trusted partner is paradoxically both a big leap forward in the relationship and, for some, almost business as usual. Beyond making Australia\u2019s defence and security efforts in the region more comprehensive and bringing together more elements than just defence in a whole-of-government approach, these agreements should be viewed as another step in deep relationships that ingrain the participants in each other\u2019s systems and make them more dedicated to ongoing engagement.<\/p>\n

As competition continues to create tension across the Pacific and security threats become more complex and intertwined, Australia\u2019s regional and bilateral relationships will be crucial. Pacific security will remain intrinsically linked to Australia\u2019s own security. But security treaties and agreements, no matter how legitimate and public they are, aren\u2019t anything without the building blocks before them, or the action that follows.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Security agreements are an increasingly hot topic in the Pacific as Australia, the US, China and New Zealand seek broad arrangements across the region. Melanesian countries have attracted the most attention; over the past 15 …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1638,"featured_media":80914,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,1056,265,2160,357,142,228],"class_list":["post-80908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-australia","tag-bilateral-relations","tag-fiji","tag-pacific-islands","tag-papua-new-guinea","tag-regional-security","tag-solomon-islands"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nPacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Security agreements are an increasingly hot topic in the Pacific as Australia, the US, China and New Zealand seek broad arrangements across the region. Melanesian countries have attracted the most attention; over the past 15 ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-07-04T04:00:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-07-04T03:56:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GettyImages-1241850048.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Lucy Albiston\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Lucy Albiston\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GettyImages-1241850048.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GettyImages-1241850048.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683,\"caption\":\"Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong (R) greets Vanuatu Prime Minister Bob Loughman (L) at a panel discussion during the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) in Suva on July 12, 2022. (Photo by William WEST \/ AFP) (Photo by WILLIAM WEST\/AFP via Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/\",\"name\":\"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-07-04T04:00:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-07-04T03:56:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a723df3c0a56e45012d08d5701a41f56\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a723df3c0a56e45012d08d5701a41f56\",\"name\":\"Lucy Albiston\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/012d4c0acb146d9c565ef0dd3125386b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/012d4c0acb146d9c565ef0dd3125386b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Lucy Albiston\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/lucy-albiston\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place | The Strategist","og_description":"Security agreements are an increasingly hot topic in the Pacific as Australia, the US, China and New Zealand seek broad arrangements across the region. Melanesian countries have attracted the most attention; over the past 15 ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2023-07-04T04:00:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-07-04T03:56:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GettyImages-1241850048.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Lucy Albiston","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Lucy Albiston","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GettyImages-1241850048.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/GettyImages-1241850048.jpg","width":1024,"height":683,"caption":"Australia's Foreign Minister Penny Wong (R) greets Vanuatu Prime Minister Bob Loughman (L) at a panel discussion during the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) in Suva on July 12, 2022. (Photo by William WEST \/ AFP) (Photo by WILLIAM WEST\/AFP via Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/","name":"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2023-07-04T04:00:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-07-04T03:56:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a723df3c0a56e45012d08d5701a41f56"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/pacific-treaties-must-be-built-with-care-and-nurtured-once-theyre-in-place\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pacific treaties must be built with care and nurtured once they\u2019re in place"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a723df3c0a56e45012d08d5701a41f56","name":"Lucy Albiston","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/012d4c0acb146d9c565ef0dd3125386b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/012d4c0acb146d9c565ef0dd3125386b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Lucy Albiston"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/lucy-albiston\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80908"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1638"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80908"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80908\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":80916,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80908\/revisions\/80916"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/80914"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}