{"id":81152,"date":"2023-07-17T11:30:05","date_gmt":"2023-07-17T01:30:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=81152"},"modified":"2023-07-17T10:57:03","modified_gmt":"2023-07-17T00:57:03","slug":"more-stick-less-carrot-australias-new-approach-to-tackling-fake-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/more-stick-less-carrot-australias-new-approach-to-tackling-fake-news\/","title":{"rendered":"More stick, less carrot: Australia\u2019s new approach to tackling fake news"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

An urgent problem for governments around the world in the digital age is how to tackle the harms caused by mis- and disinformation, and Australia is no exception.<\/p>\n

Together, mis- and disinformation fall under the umbrella term of \u2018fake news\u2019. While this phenomenon isn\u2019t new, the internet makes its rapid, vast spread unprecedented.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a tricky problem and hard to police because of the sheer amount of misinformation online. But, left unchecked, public health and safety, electoral integrity, social cohesion and ultimately democracy are at risk. The Covid-19 pandemic taught us not to be complacent, as fake news about Covid treatments led to\u00a0deadly consequences<\/a>.<\/p>\n

But what\u2019s the best way to manage the spread of fake news? How can it be done without government overreach, which risks the freedom and diversity of expression necessary for deliberation in healthy democracies?<\/p>\n

Last month, Minister for Communications Michelle Rowland released a\u00a0draft exposure bill<\/a>\u00a0to step up Australia\u2019s fight against harmful online mis- and disinformation.<\/p>\n

It offers more stick (hefty penalties) and less carrot (voluntary participation) than the current approach to managing online content.<\/p>\n

If passed, the bill will bring us closer to the European Union-style model of mandatory co-regulation.<\/p>\n

According to the draft, disinformation is spread intentionally, while misinformation is not.<\/p>\n

But both can cause serious harms including hate speech, financial harm and disruption of public order, according to the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA).<\/p>\n

Research<\/a> has shown that countries tend to approach this problem in three distinct ways:<\/p>\n