{"id":83065,"date":"2023-10-20T06:00:13","date_gmt":"2023-10-19T19:00:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=83065"},"modified":"2023-10-19T18:03:53","modified_gmt":"2023-10-19T07:03:53","slug":"the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/","title":{"rendered":"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

The phrase \u2018great and powerful friend\u2019 is a totem of Australian defence, setting strategy since federation.<\/p>\n

The totem\u2019s purpose is to make and manage The Alliance<\/u>\u2014capitalise and underline it as crucial and central. The search for certainty adds punctuation: The Alliance?<\/u><\/p>\n

Certainty is ever beset by alliance questions of interest, commitment and degrees of difficulty. Judge how the great and powerful friend will express its greatness. Count its power and weigh that against other powers.<\/p>\n

At the heart of the US \u2013Australia alliance lies the friendship calculation. What is the strength of the insurance? What will Washington do for Canberra if things get truly tough?<\/p>\n

Australia\u2019s longest-serving prime minister, Robert Menzies, coined the totem, although he expressed it in the plural, as \u2018great and powerful friends\u2019. The \u2018friends\u2019 usage meant Menzies could do a heart-and-history embrace of Britain, while swivelling his eyes and head to the new alliance with America.<\/p>\n

The ANZUS Treaty, secured by Menzies\u2019s government, is in its eighth decade<\/a>, and the totem still does symbolic duty. The totem\u2019s deeper use, though, is as a gauge, to measure the constant question: how fares the great and powerful friend?<\/p>\n

Answering that question, an outstanding Washington strategist, Robert Gates, has just pronounced the US \u2018the dysfunctional superpower<\/a>\u2019.<\/p>\n

Gates rose from entry-level analyst to become director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 1991 to 1993. Then he was secretary of defence from 2006 to 2011, serving in the cabinets of both a Republican and a Democrat president, a rare bipartisan achievement. Gates damns the unpredictable mayhem of Washington as it faces extraordinary international challenges, beginning his Foreign Affairs<\/em><\/a> article:<\/p>\n

The\u00a0United States now confronts graver threats to its security than it has in decades, perhaps ever. Never before has it faced four allied antagonists at the same time\u2014Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran\u2014whose collective nuclear arsenal could within a few years be nearly double the size of its own. Not since the Korean War has the United States had to contend with powerful military rivals in both Europe and Asia. And no one alive can remember a time when an adversary had as much economic, scientific, technological, and military power as China does today.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Beyond the accounting of external challenges, the essay is striking for its pessimism about what \u2018fractured political leadership\u2019 means for the US\u2019s global role.<\/p>\n

The division of powers is a design feature that builds conflict into the workings of Washington. Yet today\u2019s dysfunction can divert and distract the superpower. Gates sees no \u2018long-term strategy to ensure that the United States, and democratic values more broadly, will prevail\u2019. A wise owl\u2014an insider\u2019s insider\u2014worries that domestic political warfare will cause America to lose the geopolitical contest:<\/p>\n

The United States finds itself in a uniquely treacherous position: facing aggressive adversaries with a propensity to miscalculate yet incapable of mustering the unity and strength necessary to dissuade them. Successfully deterring leaders such as Xi [Jinping] and\u00a0[Vladimir] Putin\u00a0depends on the certainty of commitments and constancy of response. Yet instead, dysfunction has made American power erratic and unreliable, practically inviting risk-prone autocrats to place dangerous bets\u2014with potentially catastrophic effects.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Donald Trump may be more symptom than cause (though he\u2019s a helluva symptom), as Gates laments: \u2018Both friends and adversaries wonder whether Biden\u2019s engagement and alliance-building is a return to normal or whether Trump\u2019s \u201cAmerica first\u201d disdain for allies will be the dominant thread in American policy in the future. Even the closest of allies are hedging their bets about America.\u2019<\/p>\n

The hedging quandary will get no public attention as Anthony Albanese heads to the White House next week for his first visit as prime minister, offering his version<\/a> of the totem: \u2018The Australia\u2013United States relationship is unique in scale, scope and significance, reflecting more than 100 years of partnership between our nations.\u2019<\/p>\n

The scale\u2013scope\u2013significance combo will allow the PM to lift his eyes above the Washington mayhem. Albanese will hew to the familiar frame of the great and powerful friend, even if a prime minister from Labor\u2019s left will never lift the phrase from the Liberal Party founder.<\/p>\n

Menzies, though, was a canny realist beneath the silver tongue and political carapace. And the calculations underpinning the three dimensions of his totem can take the alliance temperature in a time of feverish temper.<\/p>\n

On the power measure, the US still has military weight that puts it in a class of its own, as Gates comments: \u2018All told, the United States spends more on defense than the next ten countries combined, including Russia and China.\u2019<\/p>\n

The economic element of power tells a tale of shifting relativities. Under the purchasing power parity<\/a> metric,\u00a0China overtook the\u00a0US<\/a>\u00a0to become the world\u2019s top economy in\u00a02014.\u00a0The US is still number one when measuring nominal GDP<\/a> in US dollars. Which indicator you pick can depend on the argument you want to make about power.<\/p>\n

In the region that matters to Australia, a rich new era of Asian commerce<\/a> arrives, yet US protectionism means it will have \u2018fewer economic carrots<\/a> to offer\u2019 and US \u2018economic and political sway will be diminished\u2019, as The Economist <\/em>notes. \u2018America will retain influence over Asian security, but its economic importance will decline.\u2019<\/p>\n

Many indices track power. It\u2019s more complex to measure the \u2018great\u2019 bit of the totem. How a great nation uses its power can be a matter of character and politics as much as policy interest. What Gates fears about an \u2018erratic and unreliable\u2019 Washington echoes a view Menzies put in a 1959 letter to his deputy prime minister after a US visit: \u2018There are, from our point of view, some crazy things<\/a> done in Washington.\u2019<\/p>\n

Menzies would have embraced the lines Lord Carrington used as NATO secretary-general: the allies \u2018sing in harmony, not in unison\u2019 and whatever the frustrating discordant notes, \u2018they\u2019re the only Americans we have\u2019.<\/p>\n

Menzies believed in the US as a great power because \u2018predominant power means predominant responsibility\u2019<\/a>. In the opening stages of the Cold War in 1950, Menzies observed that \u2018any enlightened American\u2019 would see that \u2018domination of Europe by the common enemy would lead to an American isolation which would be for the American people not merely ominous, but disastrous\u2019.<\/p>\n

The canny realist\u2019s view was that the US had an abiding interest in maintaining the global balance. And these days, the\u00a0global balance is set in the Indo-Pacific<\/a>\u00a0(even Europe quietly adjusts). Australia\u2019s defence strategic review<\/a> mentioned it as a simple statement of fact: \u2018The Indo-Pacific is the most important geostrategic region in the world.\u2019 The new geography of power adds extra value to the \u2018friend\u2019 dimension of the totem. What the Indo-Pacific demands of the US becomes the broad frame for the ANZUS friendship.<\/p>\n

Reading the ANZUS Treaty as a lawyer inspects a contract, Menzies noted that nothing is automatic or required, but between \u2018contracting parties of good faith it renders common action against a common danger substantially inevitable\u2019. Savour the shades and weighting of that phrase: substantially inevitable<\/em>.<\/p>\n

Menzies claimed ANZUS as one of his greatest achievements and turned it into a formidable political weapon against Labor. Yet he was a sceptical participant in the creation of ANZUS, with the key Australian role played by the external affairs minister, Percy Spender.<\/p>\n

In Spender’s words, Menzies was \u2018unenthusiastic\u2019 and \u2018poured cold water\u2019<\/a> on the efforts to create a Pacific pact. The Menzies view was that Australia didn\u2019t need a formal alliance because the US was \u2018already overwhelmingly friendly to us and Australia could rely on her\u2019. He described the idea of a Pacific pact as \u2018a superstructure on a foundation of jelly\u2019. There\u2019s quite a distance from \u2018jelly\u2019 to \u2018substantially inevitable\u2019, but a canny politician executes such swivels with nary a blush.<\/p>\n

Menzies thought American interests and the nature of America would drive US actions, whatever the terms of the alliance contract. Indeed, he was happy to bandwagon on US military spending; in the choice between guns and butter, Menzies\u2019s budget choice was butter.<\/p>\n

In his book on the Menzies era<\/a>, one of the few negative notes struck by former prime minister John Howard is the comment that defence spending was low in the 1950s and into the 1960s: \u2018In a sense, one of the benefits of ANZUS was that, in financial terms, Australia\u2019s defence came cheaply.\u2019<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s lift in Australia\u2019s defence budget\u2014in our era of disruption, deterrence and dollars<\/a>\u2014is partly about contributing to the alliance. But it\u2019s also a response to the questions raised by another big \u2018d\u2019 issue\u2014the dysfunction of Washington.<\/p>\n

Albanese heads to take a close-up look at the great and powerful ally, and make some quiet soundings about the future of the friendship.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The phrase \u2018great and powerful friend\u2019 is a totem of Australian defence, setting strategy since federation. The totem\u2019s purpose is to make and manage The Alliance\u2014capitalise and underline it as crucial and central. The search …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":79,"featured_media":83068,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[131,2047,56,1151,2397],"class_list":["post-83065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-anzus","tag-australia-us-relations","tag-indo-pacific","tag-robert-menzies","tag-us-alliances"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nThe dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The phrase \u2018great and powerful friend\u2019 is a totem of Australian defence, setting strategy since federation. The totem\u2019s purpose is to make and manage The Alliance\u2014capitalise and underline it as crucial and central. The search ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-19T19:00:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-10-19T07:03:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-736360.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graeme Dobell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-736360.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-736360.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":675,\"caption\":\"381943 04: A flag flies atop the White House November 15, 2000 in Washington, DC as the United States awaits a decision in the presidential elections which have remained unresolved for more than a week. (Photo by Alex Wong\/Newsmakers)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/\",\"name\":\"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-10-19T19:00:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-10-19T07:03:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f\",\"name\":\"Graeme Dobell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graeme Dobell\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend | The Strategist","og_description":"The phrase \u2018great and powerful friend\u2019 is a totem of Australian defence, setting strategy since federation. The totem\u2019s purpose is to make and manage The Alliance\u2014capitalise and underline it as crucial and central. The search ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2023-10-19T19:00:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-10-19T07:03:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-736360.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graeme Dobell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graeme Dobell","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-736360.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-736360.jpg","width":1024,"height":675,"caption":"381943 04: A flag flies atop the White House November 15, 2000 in Washington, DC as the United States awaits a decision in the presidential elections which have remained unresolved for more than a week. (Photo by Alex Wong\/Newsmakers)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/","name":"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2023-10-19T19:00:13+00:00","dateModified":"2023-10-19T07:03:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-dysfunctional-us-as-great-and-powerful-friend\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The dysfunctional US as great and powerful friend"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/ed3342cd61abc65c1532f3cc46bdf96f","name":"Graeme Dobell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/dff56734d4df784248f63058b7b6900a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graeme Dobell"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/graeme-dobell\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83065"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/79"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83065"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83065\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83069,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83065\/revisions\/83069"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/83068"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}