{"id":83480,"date":"2023-11-09T06:00:56","date_gmt":"2023-11-08T19:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=83480"},"modified":"2023-11-08T16:43:17","modified_gmt":"2023-11-08T05:43:17","slug":"us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/","title":{"rendered":"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

US efforts to encourage Indo-Pacific nations to diversify their trade away from China confront a well-established trend towards deeper regional integration, according to a report by the US-based Peterson Institute for International Economics.<\/p>\n

The Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF), launched by US President Joe Biden last year, was intended to help 14 Indo-Pacific nations pursue \u2018friend-shoring\u2019 and \u2018near-shoring\u2019 of their supply lines.<\/p>\n

While there have tentative signs of a shift in Australia\u2019s imports away from China in recent months, the trend over the past decade for both Australia and the Asian region has been for far deeper integration with China.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0Peterson Institute study found that of the 14 nations targeted by the IPEF, all except for Japan and the United States had deepened their dependence on imported Chinese manufactured goods over the past decade.<\/p>\n

Australia and Thailand were the only countries to lessen their dependence on China for their exports of manufactured goods. In the case of Australia, manufactured goods exports to China are swamped by imports, which are almost 20 times larger.<\/p>\n

\u2018Despite efforts by the Biden administration to strengthen ties with its IPEF partners and wean them away from Beijing, these countries are increasingly reliant on economic ties with China,\u2019 the report says.<\/p>\n

\u2018China is the top import source for all IPEF countries except Brunei as well as the top export destination for half: on average IPEF countries received more than 30 percent of their imports from China and sent almost 20 percent of their exports to China in 2021. These numbers reflect average increases in the China share of over 40 percent for imports and almost 45 percent for exports since 2010.\u2019<\/p>\n

Australia has a greater dependence on China as a market than any other IPEF economy, selling 36.3% of its merchandise exports there in the six months to August. That\u2019s a rise of nearly 10 percentage points from a low of 27.5% in the six months to September last year, when Australian exports were feeling the full effect of China\u2019s discriminatory trade bans.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s share of Australian exports is still below the record 42.5% hit in the six months to October 2020. However, its share is likely to rise further with increased purchases of Australian coal, barley and beef and the prospect of resumed sales of wine and lobster once remaining trade bans are fully removed.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s tentative evidence that Australian companies are shifting at least some of their purchases to non-Chinese suppliers. China\u2019s share of Australia\u2019s imports in the six months to August was 24.3%, the lowest since July 2019, and down from the peak of 30.5% reached in September 2020.<\/p>\n

China\u2019s share of the Australian import market has gone to other Asian suppliers, led by Korea, Malaysia, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan and India.<\/p>\n

However,\u00a0International Monetary Fund research<\/a> on US trade, which has exhibited a similar decline in import dependence on China, has found that the industries in countries that are gaining US market share at China\u2019s apparent expense are all closely tied to China for their supplies. \u2018Countries that were more deeply engaged in Chinese supply chains experienced the most rapid export growth to the US.\u2019<\/p>\n

While China\u2019s economic growth may be slowing, the momentum of the Chinese manufactured goods sector is still driving trade across the region. The\u00a0Asian Development Bank\u2019s<\/a>\u00a0annual report on regional integration shows that China\u2019s share of Asian merchandise trade has risen from 10.3% to 16.7% over the past 20 years, with that gain coming at the expense of the US, whose share has fallen from 20.7% to 13.2%. Intra-regional trade, including China, now accounts for 58.2% of trade in Asia.<\/p>\n

The hallmark characteristic of globalisation\u2014the distribution of manufactured production of goods among several countries\u2014is continuing to rise both in Asia and around the world, with the growth of exports of goods that are produced in more than one country outstripping the rise of exports produced in a single country. This is continuing to power intra-regional trade.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s too soon for assessments of the impact of the huge intra-regional trade agreement, the Regional and Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), which was signed in early 2020 and entered full force, with the Philippines being the last to ratify, in June this year. However, it\u2019s to be expected that it will further accelerate regional integration.<\/p>\n

The agreement\u2014which covers China, Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand and all the ASEAN economies\u2014includes both tariff cuts and standard and relatively simple rules of origin, which mean that products benefit from tariff cuts if they are predominantly made from goods produced in member economies.<\/p>\n

The US has marginalised itself from this process of regional integration by the decisions of both the Trump and Biden administrations to abandon trade liberalisation in the Asian region, declining to enter new trade agreements. The IPEF proposal doesn\u2019t include any improved access for Asian exporters to US markets.<\/p>\n

A recent report in the\u00a0South China Morning Post<\/em><\/a> said that successive Australian governments had commissioned reports into the prospects for diversifying Australia\u2019s trade away from China and all had concluded it was impossible.<\/p>\n

The report, by the SCMP\u2019s Kandy Wong, said the first study, conducted jointly by the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, was commissioned by the Abbott government in 2015 to follow US concern that Australia\u2019s economic dependence on China was making it vulnerable to Chinese pressure. The Morrison government called for a follow-up study, in 2020, and there was apparently a third study conducted by the Albanese government.<\/p>\n

The paper cited unnamed sources saying the studies concluded that \u2018no other markets could replace China as a market for Australian commodity exports\u2019. They also reportedly said the studies had made it clear that Australia \u2018cannot successfully diversify trade away from China. Diversification to Southeast Asia is really\u00a0China plus<\/a>.\u2019<\/p>\n

They are conclusions that will inform the Albanese government\u2019s decision on whether to approve the start of negotiations with China over its accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. This trade agreement, which includes 12 nations, was originally designed by the Obama administration as a means to advance US integration with the Asian region while locking China out. However, with both the Trump and Biden administrations deciding not to \u00a0participate, China has seen an opportunity to advance its regional integration further, at the US\u2019s expense.<\/p>\n

The CPTPP goes further than RCEP, offering tariff reductions of 99% compared with RCEP\u2019s 90% and including chapters on financial services, telecommunications, state-owned enterprises, labour relations, competition policy, transparency and anti-corruption. Many suggest that the demands written into CPTPP are too tough for China to meet; however, Vietnam managed, partly due to some leeway granted, and China would be hoping for the same.<\/p>\n

All existing members have the ability to veto a new applicant. Australia couldn\u2019t approve the start of negotiations while China still had discriminatory\u2014and illegal under World Trade Organization rules\u2014trade measures imposed on Australia, and while it was refusing to talk to the Australian government.<\/p>\n

With those barriers being removed, the government may at some point decide Australia has nothing to lose by commencing a process that could result in further integration of China into the regional economy.\u00a0However, it could do so with no greater confidence that, once it was admitted, China would stick to the CPTPP trade rules than it did the rules of the 2015 China\u2013Australia Free Trade Agreement when it decided to teach the Morrison government a lesson.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

US efforts to encourage Indo-Pacific nations to diversify their trade away from China confront a well-established trend towards deeper regional integration, according to a report by the US-based Peterson Institute for International Economics. The Indo-Pacific …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":955,"featured_media":83481,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,52,3024,56,1817,365,31],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nUS-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"US efforts to encourage Indo-Pacific nations to diversify their trade away from China confront a well-established trend towards deeper regional integration, according to a report by the US-based Peterson Institute for International Economics. The Indo-Pacific ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-11-08T19:00:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-11-08T05:43:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1633925585.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"718\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David Uren\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David Uren\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1633925585.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1633925585.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":718,\"caption\":\"QINGDAO, CHINA - AUGUST 23: A container ship leaves the fully automated container terminal of Qingdao Port on August 23, 2023 in Qingdao, Shandong Province of China. (Photo by Zhang Jingang\/VCG via Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/\",\"name\":\"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-11-08T19:00:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-11-08T05:43:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/07ec47d66a34bf398dee02ff1647e850\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/07ec47d66a34bf398dee02ff1647e850\",\"name\":\"David Uren\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/099da5eec4160cac735492742aed6ee2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/099da5eec4160cac735492742aed6ee2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"David Uren\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/david-uren\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China | The Strategist","og_description":"US efforts to encourage Indo-Pacific nations to diversify their trade away from China confront a well-established trend towards deeper regional integration, according to a report by the US-based Peterson Institute for International Economics. The Indo-Pacific ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2023-11-08T19:00:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-11-08T05:43:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":718,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1633925585.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"David Uren","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"David Uren","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1633925585.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/GettyImages-1633925585.jpg","width":1024,"height":718,"caption":"QINGDAO, CHINA - AUGUST 23: A container ship leaves the fully automated container terminal of Qingdao Port on August 23, 2023 in Qingdao, Shandong Province of China. (Photo by Zhang Jingang\/VCG via Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/","name":"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2023-11-08T19:00:56+00:00","dateModified":"2023-11-08T05:43:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/07ec47d66a34bf398dee02ff1647e850"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/us-led-indo-pacific-framework-isnt-shifting-regional-trade-away-from-china\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"US-led Indo-Pacific framework isn\u2019t shifting regional trade away from China"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/07ec47d66a34bf398dee02ff1647e850","name":"David Uren","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/099da5eec4160cac735492742aed6ee2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/099da5eec4160cac735492742aed6ee2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"David Uren"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/david-uren\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83480"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/955"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=83480"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83480\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":83483,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/83480\/revisions\/83483"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/83481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=83480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=83480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=83480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}