{"id":83896,"date":"2023-12-01T14:30:47","date_gmt":"2023-12-01T03:30:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=83896"},"modified":"2024-01-15T13:23:01","modified_gmt":"2024-01-15T02:23:01","slug":"from-national-intelligence-community-to-national-intelligence-power","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/from-national-intelligence-community-to-national-intelligence-power\/","title":{"rendered":"From \u2018national intelligence community\u2019 to \u2018national intelligence power\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/figure>\n

Australian intelligence\u2019s foremost challenge is to further evolve from being a \u2018national intelligence community\u2019 to generating \u2018national intelligence power\u2019. It will do that by more effectively integrating intelligence into the government\u2019s broad policymaking, strategising and action, including through adaptive and purposeful applications of intelligence in collaboration with other arms of statecraft. That\u2019s the judgment of our submission<\/a> to the independent intelligence review<\/a> being undertaken by Heather Smith and Richard Maude and likely to report in mid-2024.<\/p>\n

We make the case that while the previous review<\/a>, in 2017, provided the foundation for more effective national intelligence capability, the National Intelligence Community (NIC) it created requires further adaptation\u2014including in response to hard lessons from the past six years.<\/p>\n

Those lessons should spur the NIC towards achieving enhanced competitiveness, sovereignty, preparedness (and utility), resilience and tech-readiness; to being sufficiently integrated and collaborative; and being able to help Australia navigate its perilous strategic circumstances. And our submission identifies that this adaptation centres on three fundamental challenges and two opportunities:<\/p>\n