{"id":8790,"date":"2013-08-27T13:30:04","date_gmt":"2013-08-27T03:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=8790"},"modified":"2013-08-28T09:37:08","modified_gmt":"2013-08-27T23:37:08","slug":"the-battle-for-cybermetrics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/the-battle-for-cybermetrics\/","title":{"rendered":"The battle for cybermetrics"},"content":{"rendered":"
This July the Australian Crime Commission (ACC) released the Organised Crime in Australia – 2013 Report<\/a><\/i>, an unclassified version of the Organised Crime Threat Assessment<\/i>. Pointing at globalisation and technology as key enablers for the nefarious work of organised crime, the report gave cybercrime its rightful due. However, despite the trending appreciation Canberra has afforded to cybersecurity and cybercrimes, the larger public and business community hasn’t been similarly mobilised.<\/p>\n Labelling cybercrime a ‘significant’ threat to Australia, the report looks to the 2012 Norton Cybercrime Report<\/a> pegging the global cost for cybercrime at US$110 billion annually and US$1.7 billion per year for Australia alone. With the Pomenon Institute<\/a> estimating an US$2.16 million average cost per major cyber intrusion, it’s shocking that the public and business community isn\u2019t up in arms.<\/p>\n With the Department of Defence suggesting that relatively simple measures<\/a> like application white listing, patch applications, patching operating systems, and minimising the number of users with domain or local administrator privileges alone could mitigate up to 85% of cyber intrusions, one could easily question why such large reported costs haven’t spurred universal adoption of even the most basic security measures.<\/p>\n No doubt there are a number of factors at play, but the metrics themselves might explain some of the apparent disconnect. The US$1.7 billion cited by the ACC report, a number that’s slightly less daunting when considered as 0.11% of the estimated US$1.54 trillion Australian economy, is nearly as intangible as many of the cybercrimes themselves. Simply put, the cost evaluation of cybercrimes on an individual and business level, as well as on a national and global economic level, is an inexact and underdeveloped art.<\/p>\n Cybercrimes usually lack the tangibility of shoplifting; the pilfering of intellectual property can take years to materialize (if ever) and often go undetected, and a computer can be commandeered by hackers with little noticeable impact to the users themselves. With such intangibility to the crime, reliable metrics are an absolute necessity, not only for the study of cybersecurity but also to help individuals and businesses to recognise and respond to the threat appropriately.<\/p>\n