{"id":88393,"date":"2024-08-16T17:51:51","date_gmt":"2024-08-16T07:51:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?p=88393"},"modified":"2024-08-16T17:55:51","modified_gmt":"2024-08-16T07:55:51","slug":"putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/","title":{"rendered":"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/figure>\n

The New Zealand-US component of ANZUS was suspended in the 1980s because Wellington refused to admit American Navy vessels that were nuclear-powered, or that might be carrying nuclear weapons, into its ports.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Buried in paragraph 21 of today\u2019s <\/span>joint statement<\/span><\/a> between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is a moment in history that many might miss\u2014a rare reference to the continued importance of the ANZUS Treaty to the Australia-New Zealand alliance:\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2018In the event of a cyber-attack that threatened the territorial integrity, political independence or security of either of our nations, Australia and New Zealand would consult together under the ANZUS Treaty to determine appropriate options to address the threat. They also affirmed that a cyber-attack on either nation could constitute an armed attack under Article IV of the ANZUS Treaty. A decision on whether such a cyber-attack would constitute an armed attack would be made on a case-by-case basis through close consultations between Australia and New Zealand.\u2019<\/span><\/i>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

ASPI experts unpack the significance.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Justin Bassi, executive director<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

This is significant for multiple reasons. First, confirmation that a cyber-attack on either nation could constitute an armed attack under the ANZUS Treaty provides useful clarity.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

But even more significant is the acknowledgment by Luxon of the ANZUS Treaty itself. After the breakdown of the ANZUS Treaty as a trilateral alliance in 1985 with the downgrading of the relationship between the United States and New Zealand, the Treaty has rarely been named by the New Zealand political class, despite being the source of its bilateral alliance with Australia.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

When Australia and the US celebrated ANZUS\u2019s 70th Anniversary in 2021, neither the NZ Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern nor her defence or foreign ministers referred to it at all. <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The reference to ANZUS continues Luxon\u2019s foreign policy reset. He has been bolder than his predecessors, laying out a role for New Zealand within a global strategic outlook that is based on core partnerships. In a world of conflict, with wars in Europe and the Middle East and China creating tensions in the South China Sea and over Taiwan, New Zealand is messaging that it wants to be involved in the discussions on how to regain stability and deterrence, and that it has a role to play.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

This latest backing in of ANZUS comes off the Luxon government\u2019s public support for the Five Eyes group\u2014which was downplayed by the previous New Zealand government\u2014and his attendance at the recent NATO Summit in Washington, where he said: \u2018The intensifying military relationship we see between Russia and North Korea and China\u2019s role in supporting the rebuilding of Russia\u2019s industrial base demonstrates the indivisibility of issues between Europe and our part of the world.\u2019<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Bart Hogeveen, acting director of cyber, technology and security<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The recognition that a cyber-attack could constitute an armed attack against the territorial integrity of either state under the ANZUS treaty is a welcome step that brings the Australia-New Zealand alliance into alignment with other liberal alliances.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

AUSMIN, NATO and the US-Japan security treaty have all indicated that a cyber attack could constitute an armed attack that warrants a collective response. <\/span>Today\u2019s statement by Albanese and Luxon is arguably the strongest ANZUS reference to collective cyber defence, noting it was made at the leaders\u2019 level and connects to Article 4, the main collective defence clause of ANZUS.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

It shows a growing acceptance by the New Zealand and Australian governments that the digital domain is also a domain of warfare. It builds on recent attributions by Canberra and Wellington, independently and collaboratively with other Five Eyes partners, of malicious cyber operations affecting national and economic security, and electoral processes.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Cyber threat assessments from New Zealand\u2019s signals intelligence and cybersecurity agencies have become more alarming in recent years. Recognising that such state-sponsored operations and campaigns may\u2014at some point and in certain circumstances\u2014amount to an armed attack serves as an important deterrent. It also paves the way for Canberra and Wellington to set boundaries to when, where and how international law applies to state conduct in cyberspace, including the laws of armed conflict.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Euan Graham, senior analyst<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

New Zealand has endorsed AUKUS\u2019s contribution to regional security and stability, while also registering its interest in participating in Pillar II in future. The fact that there are no explicit caveats attached to Pillar I in the Joint Statement further suggests that the Luxon government will approach Australia\u2019s acquisition of nuclear-powered submarines, under AUKUS, pragmatically and in a low-key manner in spite of Wellington\u2019s prevailing anti-nuclear policies.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The mutual embedding of senior ADF and NZDF officers into the joint commands of each other\u2019s armed forces will make it easier for Australia and New Zealand to conduct military operations together, and is a sign of their willingness to integrate at a deeper level.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The reference to \u2018combined procurement\u2019 in an \u2018ANZAC\u2019 context is also a welcome indication that interoperability remains important to New Zealand\u2014a point underscored by New Zealand\u2019s induction into service of the P-8A, as a high-end maritime surveillance and anti-submarine platform that can operate seamlessly alongside the ADF and US forces.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

It also leaves the door open for New Zealand to join Australia\u2019s general-purpose frigate acquisition in future, although Wellington is not quite at that point yet. Australia would be likely to support this \u2018ANZAC redux\u2019 option, for reasons of interoperability, but also to generate an economy of scale that could bring down the costs of its own acquisition process.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

While the main significance of the joint statement is in the revival of ANZUS and its explicit invocation in the scenario of a cyber attack, New Zealand and Australia remain military partners in Southeast Asia, though the Five Power Defence Arrangements, as well as close partners in the Pacific. Hence the nod towards close defence co-operation will also be read into these regional commitments where the ADF and NZDF have existing commitments and close habits of cooperation.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Malcolm Davis, senior analyst<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The important recognition of the challenge posed by cyber threats in the Luxon-Albanese joint statement is an opportunity for both Australia and New Zealand to work more closely together on another increasingly important domain\u2014space. In reality, the two domains cannot be decoupled.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Both countries will increasingly depend on constellations of satellites to support a full range of national activities, and to ensure national security and prosperity. Space is a contested and congested operational domain with satellites\u2014and the ground stations that manage them\u2014being ideal targets for an adversary to threaten with cyber attacks.\u00a0 Such a \u2018soft kill\u2019 produces no space debris but denies access to vital space support. In this sense, the dependency of both countries on the space domain, and the threat posed by cyberwarfare, sees the boundaries of space and cyberspace increasingly blurred.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Working together on space could provide a pathway for New Zealand to engage with AUKUS Pillar 2 in cyber\u2014in which New Zealand Defence Minister Judith Collins has shown an interest. Space is also becoming relevant to Pillar 2, with the announcement that the Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability (DARC) will be established under AUKUS.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Alex Bristow, senior analyst<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

When New Zealand refused to admit into its ports US Navy vessels that were nuclear-powered or might be carrying nuclear weapons, Washington\u2019s view was that if its allies wanted protection\u2014including shelter under the nuclear umbrella\u2014they had to accept some of the risks associated with extended deterrence. Freeriding was not an option. With America First shaping US politics today, that view has only hardened.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Today\u2019s announcement has not reset the nuclear clock. While there has been some restoration of US-New Zealand defence co-operation since the 1980s, including port visits to New Zealand by conventionally powered and armed US Navy ships, anti-nuclear sentiment remains embedded in New Zealand. Wellington\u2019s nuclear ban will extend to the conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines that Australia will acquire through AUKUS, as Luxon\u2019s predecessor Jacinda Ardern made clear after AUKUS was announced.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

While anti-nuclear sentiment was also significant in Australia in the 1980s, Canberra used nimble diplomacy to mitigate the blowback it felt from the fracturing of ANZUS. By signing the Treaty of Rarotonga in 1985, which established the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone, Canberra mollified Wellington and its wider Pacific partners. But Canberra also inserted caveats into the treaty that made visits by US nuclear forces exempt from the prohibition on stationing nuclear weapons within the SPNFZ\u2014a policy that has allowed nuclear-capable US bombers to rotate through Australia for decades.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Today\u2019s announcement deals with cyber, but it refocuses minds on the continued importance of ANZUS for wider deterrence. At some point, that discussion must include the US and must cover extended nuclear deterrence. The conversation will become more complicated as the US develops a more conspicuous forward presence for its nuclear forces in the Indo-Pacific and expects more burden-sharing from allies to support this.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Raji Rajagopalan, resident senior fellow, ASPI<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Luxon has attached special importance to India in the speech, stating that he is determined to broaden and deepen New Zealand\u2019s relations with India. Clearly, there is interest on both sides in enhancing the relationship even though, traditionally, India and New Zealand\u00a0have\u00a0not been significant partners. <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

This is changing with the increasing frequency of visits and contact between the two countries. India\u2019s President <\/span>Droupadi Murmu<\/span>\u00a0was in New Zealand earlier this month, while New Zealand\u2019s Foreign Minister Winston Peters was in Delhi a few months back. <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

There is talk of a free trade agreement even though, according to the Indian foreign ministry, it remains aspirational at this point. India is also establishing a new consulate in Auckland. There are now about 8,000 Indian students in New Zealand, and the two countries signed an air services agreement to facilitate direct flights.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

New Zealand has a high-technology base that could help India. For example, India used a chip manufactured by a New Zealand company in its Chandrayaan space mission.\u00a0<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Underlying this desire for closer ties is concern about the growing instability in the region and the world, which Luxon highlighted in his Lowy speech. There are likely to be some disagreements on Russia and Ukraine, but this is common to India\u2019s relations.<\/span><\/p>\n

What is more pertinent is the concern about China in the Indo-Pacific. A recent survey in New Zealand showed that India has now overtaken Singapore as the third most important Asian country, while concern about China continues to grow. <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Prime Minister Luxon supported the expanding scaffolding security architecture in the region, including the Quad, which New Delhi will appreciate. <\/span><\/p>\n

There is a potential for future co-operation between Quad countries and New Zealand in areas such as space technology, cyber warfare and intelligence. Another area of potential co-operation is the South Pacific because of the large Indian diaspora in the region. Indeed, the Indian President went to Fiji before arriving in New Zealand.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The New Zealand-US component of ANZUS was suspended in the 1980s because Wellington refused to admit American Navy vessels that were nuclear-powered, or that might be carrying nuclear weapons, into its ports.\u00a0 Buried in paragraph …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":840,"featured_media":88395,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[131,3111,2225,474,69,73],"class_list":["post-88393","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","tag-anzus","tag-aukus","tag-denuclearisation","tag-extended-nuclear-assurance","tag-india","tag-new-zealand"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nPutting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot | The Strategist<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot | The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The New Zealand-US component of ANZUS was suspended in the 1980s because Wellington refused to admit American Navy vessels that were nuclear-powered, or that might be carrying nuclear weapons, into its ports.\u00a0 Buried in paragraph ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Strategist\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-08-16T07:51:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-08-16T07:55:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/GettyImages-2166244872.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"672\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ASPI staff\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ASPI_org\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ASPI staff\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\",\"name\":\"The Strategist\",\"description\":\"ASPI's analysis and commentary site\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\"},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/GettyImages-2166244872.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/GettyImages-2166244872.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":672,\"caption\":\"CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA - AUGUST 16: New Zealand Prime Minister the Right Honourable Christopher Luxon (L) and Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese speak to the media during a press conference at the Australian Parliament House on August 16, 2024 in Canberra, Australia. Luxon is on a two-day annual official visit to Australia. (Photo by Tracey Nearmy\/Pool\/Getty Images)\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/\",\"name\":\"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot | The Strategist\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#primaryimage\"},\"datePublished\":\"2024-08-16T07:51:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-08-16T07:55:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a1edc048f3aa7c7886231a609c158a2a\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot\"}]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a1edc048f3aa7c7886231a609c158a2a\",\"name\":\"ASPI staff\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-AU\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/38e3c31297785398e36a2329d8758a52?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/38e3c31297785398e36a2329d8758a52?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"ASPI staff\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/aspi-staff\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot | The Strategist","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot | The Strategist","og_description":"The New Zealand-US component of ANZUS was suspended in the 1980s because Wellington refused to admit American Navy vessels that were nuclear-powered, or that might be carrying nuclear weapons, into its ports.\u00a0 Buried in paragraph ...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/","og_site_name":"The Strategist","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ASPI.org","article_published_time":"2024-08-16T07:51:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-08-16T07:55:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":672,"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/GettyImages-2166244872.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"ASPI staff","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ASPI_org","twitter_site":"@ASPI_org","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ASPI staff","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/","name":"The Strategist","description":"ASPI's analysis and commentary site","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-AU"},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/GettyImages-2166244872.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/GettyImages-2166244872.jpg","width":1024,"height":672,"caption":"CANBERRA, AUSTRALIA - AUGUST 16: New Zealand Prime Minister the Right Honourable Christopher Luxon (L) and Prime Minister of Australia, Anthony Albanese speak to the media during a press conference at the Australian Parliament House on August 16, 2024 in Canberra, Australia. Luxon is on a two-day annual official visit to Australia. (Photo by Tracey Nearmy\/Pool\/Getty Images)"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/","url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/","name":"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot | The Strategist","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#primaryimage"},"datePublished":"2024-08-16T07:51:51+00:00","dateModified":"2024-08-16T07:55:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a1edc048f3aa7c7886231a609c158a2a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-AU","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/putting-the-nz-back-into-anzus-why-a-fleeting-reference-means-a-lot\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Putting the NZ back into ANZUS: Why a fleeting reference means a lot"}]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/a1edc048f3aa7c7886231a609c158a2a","name":"ASPI staff","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-AU","@id":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/38e3c31297785398e36a2329d8758a52?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/38e3c31297785398e36a2329d8758a52?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"ASPI staff"},"url":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/author\/aspi-staff\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88393"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/840"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88393"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88393\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":88400,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88393\/revisions\/88400"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/88395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.aspistrategist.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}